Skip to main content
. 2018 Apr 4;2018(4):CD012256. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012256.pub2

Comparison 3. Different techniques, different materials: single‐stage alginate versus two stage‐two step elastomer.

Outcome or subgroup title No. of studies No. of participants Statistical method Effect size
1 Oral health‐related quality of life (OHIP‐EDENT score) 2 98 Mean Difference (Random, 95% CI) 0.05 [‐2.37, 2.47]
1.1 Parallel‐arm trial 1 50 Mean Difference (Random, 95% CI) 0.1 [‐2.42, 2.62]
1.2 Cross‐over trial 1 48 Mean Difference (Random, 95% CI) ‐0.5 [‐8.94, 7.94]
2 General satisfaction 2   Mean Difference (Random, 95% CI) Subtotals only
2.1 At 1 month 1   Mean Difference (Random, 95% CI) ‐6.50 [‐20.08, 7.08]
2.2 At 3 months 1   Mean Difference (Random, 95% CI) 0.0 [‐7.17, 7.17]
2.3 At 6 months 1   Mean Difference (Random, 95% CI) 0.0 [‐8.23, 8.23]
3 Maxillary denture satisfaction at 6 months 2 155 Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI) ‐0.02 [‐0.34, 0.29]
4 Mandibular denture satisfaction at 6 months 2 155 Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI) 0.21 [‐0.11, 0.52]