Summary of findings for the main comparison. HPV vaccine effects on cervical lesions in adolescent girls and women negative for hrHPV DNA at baseline.
HPV vaccine effects on cervical lesions in adolescent girls and women who are hrHPV DNA negative at baseline | ||||||
Patient or population: adolescent girls and women aged 15 to 26 years who are hrHPV negative before vaccination Setting: Europe, Asia Pacific countries, South & North America Intervention: HPV vaccines (at least one dose of bivalent or quadrivalent vaccines) Comparison: Placebo | ||||||
Outcomes | Anticipated absolute effects* (95% CI) | Relative effect (95% CI) | № of participants (studies) | Certainty of the evidence (GRADE) | Comments | |
Risk with placebo | Risk with HPV vaccination1 | |||||
Cervical cancer ‐ not measured | ‐ | ‐ | ‐ | ‐ | ‐ | |
CIN2+ associated with HPV16/18. Follow‐up: 3 to 5 years |
164 per 10,000 | 2 per 10,000 (0 to 8) | RR 0.01 (0.00 to 0.05) | 23,676 (3 RCTs) | ⊕⊕⊕⊕ HIGH | |
CIN3+ associated with HPV16/18 Follow‐up: 3 to 5 years |
70 per 10,000 | 0 per 10,000 (0 to 7) | RR 0.01 (0.00 to 0.10) | 20,214 (2 RCTs) | ⊕⊕⊕⊕ HIGH | Continuity correction |
AIS associated with HPV16/18 Follow‐up: 3 to 5 years |
9 per 10,000 | 0 per 10,000 (0 to 7) | RR 0.10 (0.01 to 0.82) | 20,214 (2 RCTs) | ⊕⊕⊕⊝ MODERATE 2 | Continuity correction |
Any CIN2+ irrespective of HPV type, bivalent or quadrivalent vaccine Follow‐up: 2 to 6 years |
287 per 10,000 | 106 per 10,000 (72 to 158) | RR 0.37 (0.25 to 0.55) | 25,180 (5 RCTs) | ⊕⊕⊕⊕ HIGH | Substantial subgroup heterogeneity was observed (I2= 84.3%) for bi‐ and quadrivalent vaccines. So results are reported separately for the 2 vaccines (see next 2 rows). |
Any CIN2+ irrespective of HPV type Follow‐up (bivalent): 3.5 to 6 years Follow‐up (quadrivalent): 3.5 years |
Bivalent vaccine | RR 0.33 (0.25 to 0.43) |
15,884 (4 RCTs) |
⊕⊕⊕⊕ HIGH | ||
285 per 10,000 | 94 per 10,000 (71 to 122) |
|||||
Quadrivalent vaccine | RR 0.57 (0.44 to 0.76) |
9296 (1 RCT) |
⊕⊕⊕⊝ MODERATE3 | |||
291 per 10,000 | 166 per 10,000 (128 to 221) |
|||||
Any CIN3+ irrespective of HPV type, bivalent or quadrivalent vaccine Follow‐up: 3.5 to 4 years |
109 per 10,000 | 23 per 10,000 (4 to 120) | RR 0.21 (0.04 to 1.10) | 20,719 (3 RCTs) | ⊕⊕⊕⊝ MODERATE 3 | Substantial subgroup heterogeneity was observed (I2 = 84.3%) for bi‐ and quadrivalent vaccines. So results are reported separately for the 2 vaccines (see next 2 rows). |
Any CIN3+ irrespective of HPV type Follow‐up (bivalent): 4 years Follow‐up (quadrivalent): 3.5 years |
Bivalent vaccine | RR 0.08 (0.03 to 0.23) |
11,423 (2 RCTs) |
⊕⊕⊕⊕ HIGH | ||
81 per 10,000 | 6 per 10,000 (3 to 19) |
|||||
Quadrivalent vaccine | RR 0.54 (0.36 to 0.82) |
9296 (1 RCT) |
⊕⊕⊕⊝ MODERATE3 | |||
143 per 10,000 | 77 per 10,000 (51 to 117 ) |
|||||
Any AIS irrespective of HPV type Follow‐up: 3 to 5 years | 10 per 10,000 | 0 per 10,000 (0 to 8) | RR 0.10 (0.01 to 0.76) | 20,214 (2 RCTs) | ⊕⊕⊕⊝ MODERATE 2 | Continuity correction |
1The risk in the intervention group (and its 95% confidence interval) is based on the assumed risk in the comparison group and the relative effect of the intervention (and its 95% CI). When risk in vaccine group is zero, the 95% CI is computed using an exact binomial method. AIS: adenocarcinoma in situ; CI: Confidence interval; CIN: cervical intraepithelial neoplasia; RR: Risk ratio | ||||||
GRADE Working Group grades of evidence High certainty: We are very confident that the true effect lies close to that of the estimate of the effect Moderate certainty: We are moderately confident in the effect estimate: The true effect is likely to be close to the estimate of the effect, but there is a possibility that it is substantially different Low certainty: Our confidence in the effect estimate is limited: The true effect may be substantially different from the estimate of the effect Very low certainty: We have very little confidence in the effect estimate: The true effect is likely to be substantially different from the estimate of effect |
1 Assumed risk calculated from the sum of control group event rates.
2 Downgraded due to serious imprecision in effect estimate (width 95% CI around RR > 0.6).
3 Downgraded one level due to serious imprecision. Few events observed in the two studies (9 in placebo arms and 0 in vaccination arms for the outcome of AIS HPV16/18 and 7 in placebo arms and 0 in vaccination arms for outcome of AIS of any type).