Skip to main content
. 2018 Apr 9;2018(4):CD007606. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007606.pub4

Summary of findings for the main comparison. Glucocorticosteroid avoidance or withdrawal compared to glucocorticosteroid‐based immunosuppression for liver transplanted patients.

Glucocorticosteroid avoidance or withdrawal compared to glucocorticosteroid‐based immunosuppression for liver transplanted patients
Patient or population: liver transplanted patients
 Setting: inpatient and outpatient
 Intervention: glucocorticosteroid avoidance or withdrawal
 Comparison: glucocorticosteroid‐based immunosuppression
Outcomes** Anticipated absolute effects* (95% CI) Relative effect
 (95% CI) № of participants
 (trials) Quality of the evidence
 (GRADE) Comments
Risk with glucocorticosteroid‐based immunosuppression Risk with glucocorticosteroid avoidance or withdrawal
All‐cause mortality Study population RR 1.15
 (0.93 to 1.44) 1323
 (15 RCTs) ⊕⊕⊝⊝
 LOW 1,2 The quality of the evidence was considered low for both glucocorticosteroid avoidance and glucocorticosteroid withdrawal. Trial Sequential Analysis‐adjusted CI 0.77‐1.66.
166 per 1000 191 per 1000
 (154 to 239)
Moderate
204 per 1000 234 per 1000
 (189 to 293)
Graft loss including death Study population RR 1.15
 (0.90 to 1.46) 1002
 (11 RCTs) ⊕⊕⊝⊝
 LOW 1, 2 The quality of the evidence was considered low for both glucocorticosteroid avoidance and glucocorticosteroid withdrawal. Trial Sequential Analysis‐adjusted CI 0.75‐2.01.
175 per 1000 203 per 1000
 (159 to 259)
Moderate
218 per 1000 253 per 1000
 (198 to 322)
Acute rejection Study population RR 1.33
 (1.08 to 1.64) 1347
 (16 RCTs) ⊕⊕⊝⊝
 LOW 1,2 The quality of the evidence was considered low both glucocorticosteroid avoidance and glucocorticosteroid withdrawal. Trial Sequential Analysis‐adjusted CI 0.92‐1.90.
173 per 1000 230 per 1000
 (187 to 283)
Moderate
194 per 1000 257 per 1000
 (209 to 317)
Infection Study population RR 0.88
 (0.73 to 1.05) 778
 (8 RCTs) ⊕⊝⊝⊝
 VERY LOW 1, 2, 3 The quality of the evidence was considered very low for both glucocorticosteroid avoidance and glucocorticosteroid withdrawal. Trial Sequential Analysis‐adjusted CI 0.49‐1.71.
359 per 1000 316 per 1000
 (262 to 377)
Moderate
402 per 1000 354 per 1000
 (293 to 422)
*The risk in the intervention group (and its 95% confidence interval) is based on the assumed risk in the comparison group and the relative effect of the intervention (and its 95% CI).
 **We assessed all outcomes at latest follow‐up (range 13 months to 108 months).
CI: confidence interval; RR: risk ratio; RCT: randomised clinical trial
GRADE Working Group grades of evidenceHigh quality: We are very confident that the true effect lies close to that of the estimate of the effect
 Moderate quality: We are moderately confident in the effect estimate: The true effect is likely to be close to the estimate of the effect, but there is a possibility that it is substantially different
 Low quality: Our confidence in the effect estimate is limited: The true effect may be substantially different from the estimate of the effect
 Very low quality: We have very little confidence in the effect estimate: The true effect is likely to be substantially different from the estimate of effect

1Downgraded one level due to risk of bias: all trials were at high risk of bias.
 2Downgraded one level due to imprecision identified in the Trial Sequential Analysis; 95% CI includes both benefit and harm.
 3Downgraded one level due to significant heterogeneity identified between subgroups; avoidance versus withdrawal.