Skip to main content
. 2018 Apr 9;2018(4):CD007606. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007606.pub4

Hu 2008.

Methods Trial design: randomised, single‐centre clinical trial
Mean follow‐up: not reported
Study duration: 6 months from randomisation, randomisation from September 2006 to March 2008
Language: Mandarin
Type of information: journal article
Judgement on quality: unclear risk of bias
Participants Setting: Organ Transplantation Center, the First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat‐Sen University, Guangzhou, China
Allocation of participants: 76 participants, 36 allocated to Intervention A, 40 allocated to Intervention B
Sex ratio: total: not reported
Intervention A: 5:1 (numbers and % not reported)
Intervention B: 4:1 (numbers and % not reported)
Mean age: total: not reported
Intervention A: 47.6+/‐5.8
Intervention B: 45.2+/‐6.5
Indication (no. (%)): not reported
Type of donor: deceased donor
Inclusion criteria: first liver transplantation, hepatocellular carcinoma, aged 18 to 65, deceased donor transplantation and informed consent given
Exclusion criteria: previous liver transplant, multi‐organ transplantation, living donor transplantation, ABO‐incompatible transplantation. Primary disease: primary sclerosing cholangitis or autoimmune hepatitis. Preoperative psychiatric symptoms, gastric ulcer, use of hormones, diabetes mellitus, hypertension, hyperlipidaemia or malignancy other than primary hepatocellular carcinoma. Participation in other trials
Interventions Intervention A: no intervention
Intervention B: prednisone from day 8, commencing at 48 mg reduced by 8 mg every 3 days to a maintenance dose of 4 mg by day 26, stopped after 3 months
Concomitant immunosuppression:
Tacrolimus: 3 mg intraoperatively then adjusted postoperatively to 8 to 12 micrograms/mL
Methylprednisolone: 1000 mg intraoperatively, then 500 mg on day 1, 240 mg on day 2, 200 mg on day 3, 160 mg on day 4, 80 mg on day 5, 40 mg on day 6 and 20 mg on day 7
Outcomes Mortality, infection, hepatic artery thrombosis, hypertension, diabetes mellitus, hyperlipidaemia, neurotoxicity, gastrointestinal complications, other adverse events
Notes Cross‐over between intervention arms: no
Sample size calculation: not reported
Sources of funding: National Nature foundation, China Medical Board in New York, Nature foundation of Guangzhou province
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Unclear risk Comment: Generation of randomisation sequence not described
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Unclear risk Comment: Allocation concealment not described
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias) 
 All outcomes Unclear risk Comment: Blinding of participants and medical staff not described
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) 
 All outcomes Unclear risk Comment: Blinding of outcome assessors not described
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) Unclear risk Comment: Number of withdrawals and reasons for withdrawal not reported
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Low risk Comment: All outcomes appear to be fully reported
Other bias Unclear risk Comment: No sample size calculation reported
Free of early stopping? Low risk Comment: Study not stopped early
Free of baseline imbalance? Low risk Comment: Study appears to be free from baseline imbalance