Skip to main content
. 2018 May 11;2018(5):CD011883. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011883.pub2

Comparison 3. Sensitivity analysis.

Outcome or subgroup title No. of studies No. of participants Statistical method Effect size
1 Excluding studies with unclear randomisation methods 2 234 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 1.05 [0.77, 1.44]
2 Excluding studies with unclear allocation concealment methods 2 234 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 1.05 [0.77, 1.44]
3 Exclusion of studies with high risk of bias regarding blinding 8 516 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 1.07 [0.86, 1.34]
4 Exclusion of studies with high risk of bias regarding incomplete outcome data 6 375 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 1.19 [0.92, 1.54]
5 Exclusion of studies with imputed values 8 458 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 1.16 [0.90, 1.50]
6 Fixed effects 9 533 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 1.10 [0.88, 1.38]