Skip to main content
. 2018 May 7;2018(5):CD009103. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009103.pub3

Wan 2016.

Study characteristics
Methods RCT
Unit of randomisation: participant
Participants Place of recruitment: neurology department
Numbers randomised: total: 80 (I: 40; C: 40)
% Completing final follow‐up: 100%
Inclusion criteria: ischaemic stroke, > 35 years of age, hospitalised within 1 month of an ischaemic stroke diagnosed by CT/MRI, previously independent with activities of daily living
Exclusion criteria: a history of cardio‐embolic infarction, Wernicke’s aphasia, cognitive impairment, a history of severe liver or kidney disease, and any known malignancy or other neurological diseases
Type of stroke (%): ischaemic stroke
Mean age (SD): I: 59.01 ± 12.36; C: 60.24 ± 12.57
Gender (% men): I: 75%; C: 67.5%
Ethnicity: not reported
Socio‐economic or socio‐demographic status: education level, elementary C: 22.5% I: 22.5; middle school C: 27.5%; I: 20%, high school C: 27.5%; I:27.5%, undergraduate/graduate school C: 22.5% I:30%. Employed C: 25%; I:32.5%, unemployed C: 27.5%; I: 25%, retired C:47.5%; I:42.5%
Interventions Intervention details (components, length, frequency): telephone follow‐up with stroke nurses: consisted of goal setting advice focused on selected areas with motivational elements. Delivered at 1 week, 1 and 3 months post discharge lasting 15‐20 minutes
Location: community
Mode of delivery: telephone
Personnel responsible for delivery: stroke nurse
Timing post‐stroke: post hospital discharge
Control: usual care including freely available educational brochures on understanding stroke and reducing stroke risk, in addition to GP follow‐up
Outcomes Medication adherence at 3 and 6 months
General Information Funding: this is a doctoral dissertation and was supported by grants from the Department of Health of Guangdong Province, China (No. A2014211) to Li‐Hong Wan, PI. This work was also funded by provincial (Guangdong Science and Technology Department, the Guangdong special program for scientific development, No. 2016A020215039) programs, Li‐Hong Wan, PI
Country of origin: China
Publication language: English
Notes Analysis method: analysis of variance
Risk of bias: low
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Low risk Parallel group RCT 1:1 group allocation determine by a sealed opaque envelope with a serial number on the outside
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Low risk Central allocation
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias)
All outcomes Low risk Missing data reported by group
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Low risk Examination of study reports suggests that all outcomes were reported in the pre‐specified way
Other bias Low risk The study appears to be free of other sources of bias