Skip to main content
. 2010 Apr 14;2010(4):CD004901. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004901.pub2

Comparison 2. Vaginal misoprostol ‐ 6‐hourly versus 12‐hourly dosing interval.

Outcome or subgroup title No. of studies No. of participants Statistical method Effect size
1 Vaginal birth not achieved in 24 hours 2 363 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 0.87 [0.62, 1.22]
2 Mean induction to birth interval 1 53 Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI) ‐4.70 [‐11.19, 1.79]
3 Need for analgesia 3 416 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 1.10 [0.86, 1.42]
4 Blood loss > 500 mL 1 279 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 1.32 [0.30, 5.81]
5 Mean blood loss 1 53 Mean Difference (IV, Fixed, 95% CI) 85.0 [26.53, 143.47]
6 Need for blood transfusion 2 363 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 1.99 [0.18, 21.65]
7 Surgical evacuation of the uterus 3 416 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 0.87 [0.68, 1.13]
8 Nausea 1 279 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 1.74 [0.75, 4.01]
9 Vomiting 3 416 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 2.26 [1.09, 4.71]
10 Diarrhoea 3 416 Odds Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 1.17 [0.73, 1.86]
11 Pyrexia 2 363 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 1.81 [1.36, 2.42]