Skip to main content
. 2010 Apr 14;2010(4):CD004901. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004901.pub2

Comparison 14. Sublingual misoprostol versus vaginal misoprostol.

Outcome or subgroup title No. of studies No. of participants Statistical method Effect size
1 Vaginal birth not achieved in 24 hours 2 202 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 0.24 [0.08, 0.74]
2 Induction to delivery interval 2 202 Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI) ‐4.81 [‐8.26, ‐1.37]
3 Analgesic requirements 1 102 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 1.0 [0.43, 2.31]
4 Vomiting 1 102 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 0.69 [0.35, 1.33]
5 Diarrhoea 1 102 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 2.5 [0.51, 12.30]
6 Pyrexia 1 102 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 1.0 [0.35, 2.89]