Skip to main content
. 2018 Apr 4;2018(4):CD006349. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006349.pub3
Methods Two‐arm randomised controlled trial
Participants Sample size = 106
53 randomised to percutaneous vertebroplasty group and 53 randomised to percutaneous kyphoplasty group
Inclusion and exclusion criteria unable to read as the full text is in Chinese
Interventions
  • Percutaneous kyphoplasty

  • Percutaneous vertebroplasty

Outcomes Follow‐up to 6 months
Study outcomes
  • Vertebral compression deformation

  • Bone cement distribution

  • Midline vertebral bone cement condition

  • Vertebral height restoration

  • Bone cement leakage

  • Vertebral kyphosis

  • Progressive spinal collapse

  • Nerve damage

  • VAS scores

  • ODI scores

Study name Percutaneous kyphoplasty versus percutaneous vertebroplasty for osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures: A randomized comparison. [Chinese]
Starting date Not given
Contact information Not available
Notes Trial not registered in Clinicaltrials.gov website