Table 4.
Racial segregation* | Corporate status* | ||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
White dominant | Racially mixed | POC dominant | Corporate/franchise | Independently owned | |||||||
n | % | 95 % CI | % | 95 % CI | % | 95 % CI | % | 95 % CI | % | 95 % CI | |
Healthy interior advertisements | 138 | 22·1 | 12·3, 36·5 | 22·9 | 14·3, 34·7 | 12·6 | 4·1, 32·7 | 25·0 | 15·4, 38·0 | 13·7 | 7·2, 24·5 |
Unhealthy interior advertisements | 138 | 68·7 | 53·5, 80·7 | 61·3 | 48·9, 72·5 | 60·0 | 39·7, 77·3 | 74·3d | 62·1, 83·6 | 51·0e | 38·9, 63·1 |
Healthy impulse buys | 139 | 25·7 | 15·1, 40·2 | 29·7 | 20·0, 41·7 | 35·3 | 19·4, 55·2 | 32·2 | 21·8, 44·9 | 28·0 | 18·5, 40·0 |
Unhealthy impulse buys† | 139 | 98·8a | 91·6, 100 | 90·8a,b | 84·8, 96·7 | 86·7b | 77·0, 96·4 | 98·8d | 92·6, 100 | 85·4e | 79·3, 91·4 |
POC, people of colour.
Unlike superscript letters distinguish significant differences (P≤0·05) among racial segregation categories (a,b) and among corporate status categories (d,e). Categories sharing same superscript letter were not significantly different.
Models are mutually adjusted for racial segregation and corporate status.
Results are from a linear model because the logistic model would not converge.