Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Oct 1.
Published in final edited form as: Soc Neurosci. 2018 Nov 4;14(5):594–607. doi: 10.1080/17470919.2018.1542341

Table 1.

Multilevel Models Predicting Pupil Dilation from Category, Time of Assessment and Treatment

Model 1
Category * Time
Model 2
Category * Time * Treatment
Coefficients (± SD) Coefficients (± SD)
Random effects
Intercept .43 .41
Assessment .18 (−.17) .17 (−.18)
Treatment .08 (−.32)
Coefficients (± SEM) t-value (df) Coefficients (± SEM) t-value (df)
Fixed effects
Intercept 4.53 (.24) 18.53 (15635) ** 4.43 (.24) 18.63 (15629)**
Category Bonding .27 (.01) 41.76 (15635)** .29 (.01) 32.27 (15629)**
Category Sexual .45 (.01) 68.28 (15635)** .46 (.01) 51.25 (15629)**
Treatment .06 (.03) 2.12 (15629)*
Assessment −.04 (.02) −2.36 (15635)* .10 (.07) 1.47 (15629)
Stimulus Duration .00 (.00) 23.66 (15635)** .00 (00) 23.62 (15629)**
Gender −.03 (.09) −.28 (82) −.01 (.09) −.06 (82)
Age −.02 (.01) −2.36 (82)* −.02 (.01) −2.18 (82)*
Category Bonding * Assessment −.06 (.01) −6.33 (15635)** −.05 (.01) −4.02 (15629)**
Category Sexual * Assessment −.68(.01) −7.74 (15635)** −.07 (.01) −5.85 (15629)**
Category Bonding * Treatment −.04 (.01) −3.22 (15629)**
Category Sexual * Treatment −.03 (.01) −2.57 (15629)**
Treatment * Assessment −.28 (.13) −2.17 (15629)*
Category Bonding * Treatment * Assessment −.01 (.02) −.70 (15629)
Category Sexual * Treatment * Assessment .01 (.02) 0.53 (15629)
Model fit AIC 9,035 9,031
Pseudo R-squared .733 .734
*

p < .05;

**

p < .01.

All estimates calculated by full maximum likelihood. Parameter estimates were calculated with category neutral serving as reference for the other categories; for assessment, 1st session serves as reference; for treatment, placebo serves as reference and for gender, female serves as reference.