Skip to main content
. 2019 Apr 17;49(2):76–89. doi: 10.5051/jpis.2019.49.2.76

Table 4. Relationship between patient characteristics and patient groups.

Variable CCG (n=29) ECG (n=75) ICG (n=68) NCG (n=34) P
Age (yr) 0.100
<30 8 (27.6) 6 (8.0) 6 (8.8) 4 (11.8)
30–39 6 (20.7) 12 (16.0) 23 (33.8) 6 (17.6)
40–49 9 (31.0) 24 (32.0) 16 (23.5) 12 (35.3)
50–59 4 (13.8) 24 (32.0) 18 (26.5) 8 (23.5)
≥60 2 (6.9) 9 (12.0) 5 (7.4) 4 (11.8)
Sex 0.040a)
Male 18 (62.1) 43 (57.3) 28 (41.2) 12 (35.3)
Female 11 (37.9) 32 (42.7) 40 (58.8) 22 (64.7)
Distance between hospital and residence 0.801
Short (within 10 km) 23 (79.3) 54 (72.0) 51 (75.0) 27 (79.4)
Long (more than 10 km) 6 (20.7) 21 (28.0) 17 (25.0) 7 (20.6)
Implantation 0.003a)
No 23 (79.3) 39 (52.0) 49 (72.1) 28 (82.4)
Yes 6 (20.7) 36 (48.0) 19 (27.9) 6 (17.6)
Periodontal treatment 0.883
Periodontitis treatment 23 (79.3) 54 (72.0) 54 (79.4) 25 (73.5)
SRP 15 (51.7) 37 (49.3) 35 (51.5) 16 (47.1)
SRP+FO 1–2 8 (27.6) 13 (17.3) 17 (25.0) 4 (11.8)
SRP+FO 3– 0 (0.0) 4 (5.3) 2 (2.9) 5 (14.7)
Periodontitis treatment+other treatment 2 (6.9) 7 (9.3) 2 (2.9) 2 (5.9)
Periodontitis treatment+implantation 0 (0.0) 3 (4.0) 0 (0.0) 0 (0.0)
Periodontitis treatment+MGS 2 (6.9) 4 (5.3) 2 (2.9) 2 (5.9)
Other treatment 0 (0.0) 3 (4.0) 2 (2.9) 2 (5.9)
Implantation 0 (0.0) 3 (4.0) 1 (1.5) 1 (2.9)
MGS 0 (0.0) 0 (0.0) 1 (1.5) 1 (2.9)
Scaling only 4 (13.8) 11 (14.7) 10 (14.7) 5 (14.7)

Data are number (%) values except where indicated otherwise.

CCG: complete compliance group, ECG: excellent compliance group, ICG: incomplete compliance group, NCG: non-compliance group, SRP: scaling and root planning, FO 1–2: flap operation on 1–2 sextants; FO 3–: flap operation on 3 or more sextants, MGS: mucogingival surgery.

a)Statistically significant difference (P<0.05).