Skip to main content
. 2019 May 1;3:13. doi: 10.1038/s41698-019-0085-2

Table 2.

Log-rank test and univariate analysis of RNAMethyPro risk score in each cohort analyzed for internal or external validation

Cancer type Cohort P valuea HRa (95% CI) P valueb P value of risk scorec
Colorectal cancer TCGA-COADREAD 8.14E−03 2.15 (1.20–33.83) 9.25E−03 3.06E−03
Colorectal cancer CIT 1.53E−03 2.24 (1.34–3.74) 4.68E−03 4.17E−03
Gastric cancer TCGA-STAD 1.95E−05 11.98 (2.81–51.07) 2.41E−04 3.22E−05
Gastric cancer ACRG-GC 1.36E−02 1.78 (1.12–2.83) 3.83E−02 3.23E−03
Breast cancer METABRIC Discovery 2.10E−09 3.96 (2.43–6.44) 2.04E−09 1.09E−09
Breast cancer METABRIC Validation 9.46E−03 1.73 (1.14–2.63) 2.17E−02 3.95E−03
Ovarian cancer MAYO-OV 4.21E−03 1.91 (1.22–2.99) 1.24E−02 1.81E−03
Ovarian cancer TCGA-OV 3.17E−02 1.56 (1.04–2.35) 8.22E−02 5.37E−01
Pancreatic adenocarcinoma TCGA-PAAD 2.19E−03 4.48 (1.59–12.65) 6.62E−03 2.80E−03
Hepatocellular carcinoma TCGA-LIHC 4.36E−04 2.25 (1.42–3.57) 1.19E−04 4.27E−06
Lung adenocarcinoma TCGA-LUAD 4.97E−04 2.51 (1.47–4.28) 3.97E−04 4.25E−05
Bladder urothelial carcinoma TCGA-BLCA 2.83E−04 3.08 (1.63–5.84) 1.32E−03 4.73E−03
Head and neck squamous cell carcinoma TCGA-HNSC 2.18E−07 3.27 (2.04–5.24) 1.42E−07 2.35E−05
Acute myeloid leukemia TARGET-AML 1.32E−04 2.2 (1.45–3.32) 1.29E−04 1.99E−06
Lung squamous cell carcinoma TCGA-LUSC 2.35E−02 4.79 (1.07–21.42) 5.00E−02 2.26E−02
Esophageal adenocarcinoma TCGA-ESCA(EAC) 1.78E−02 NAd 5.51E−02 5.31E−03
Esophageal squamous cell carcinoma TCGA-ESCA(ESCC) 1.25E−02 6 (1.23–29.31) 5.48E−02 1.39E−02

CI confidence interval, HR hazard ratio, NA not applicable

aLog-rank test (high-risk vs low-risk groups)

bLog-rank test (three groups)

cUnivariate Cox regression

dHR cannot be accurately estimated owing to insufficient sample size