Skip to main content
. 2018 Aug 28;68(10):1705–1712. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciy751

Table 2.

Comparison of Retraced Definite Resister Phenotype and Latent M.tb Infection Tuberculosis Contacts

RSTRs
(N = 82)
LTBI
(N = 194)
OR P-Value
% Female 47.6% 48.5% 0.977 .937
Current age (mean, SD) 22.9 (10.1) 24.12 (9.1) 0.975 .237
Time since phase 1 enrolment (median, SD) 9.2 (3.5) 9.4 (3.2) 0.982 .693
% BCG vaccinated 62.2% 69.1% 0.783 .471
Epi risk score - children (median, SD)a 6.00 (.9) 6.00 (.8) 0.867 .531
Epi risk score - adults (median, SD)a 6.00 (1.1) 6.00 (1.3) 0.839 .316
Current BMI (mean, SD) 22.3 (4.0) 23.3 (4.8) 0.965 .305
Contact with TB since original study 0% 2.6% NA .326

Abbreviations: BCG, bacille Calmette-Guérin; BMI, body mass index; Epi, epidemiologic; LTBI, latent M.tb infection; NA, not applicable; OR, odds ratio; RSTR, resister phenotype; SD, standard deviation; TB, tuberculosis.

aRisk score was generated based on the age of the contact during the original TB household contact study (phase 1); age determined the values of the score’s variables (eg, proximity to and characteristics of the index case). Analysis was stratified by age in phase 1, with children defined as <15 years old.