Skip to main content
. 2018 Sep 8;68(10):1665–1674. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciy761

Table 2.

Impact of Intensive Versus Standard Anthelminthic Treatment on Primary Outcomes

Outcome n/N (%)/Geometric Mean Unadjusted Adjusted for Outcome at Baseline by Age and Sexa
Standard Intensive RR/GMR
(95% CI)
P Value RR/GMR
(95% CI)
P Value
 Wheeze (age ≥5 years)b 44/1384 (3.2%) 43/1392 (3.1%) 1.06 (0.61–1.87) .82 1.11 (0.64–1.93) .69
 Wheeze (age <5 years) 6/284 (2.1%) 3/264 (1.1%)
Atopy (SPT)
 SPT positivity to any allergen 273/1514 (18.0%) 303/1523 (19.9%) 1.09 (0.83–1.44) .51 1.10 (0.85–1.42) .46
 SPT positivity to Dermatophagoides 162/1514 (10.7%) 164/1523 (10.8%) 0.98 (0.72–1.35) .92 1.00 (0.74–1.36) .99
 SPT positivity to Blomia tropicalis 102/1514 (6.7%) 127/1522 (8.3%) 1.26 (0.83–1.90) .26 1.27 (0.85–1.91) .22
 SPT positivity to German cockroach 156/1513 (10.3%) 194/1522 (12.8%) 1.24 (0.87–1.77) .20 1.22 (0.87–1.71) .21
Atopy (IgE detected by ImmunoCAP)
Dermatophagoides or cockroach positivity (>0.35 kUa/L) 214/390 (54.9%) 210/390 (53.9%) 0.97 (0.83–1.13) .67 0.96 (0.82–1.12) .60
Dermatophagoides positivity (asIgE > 0.35 kUa/L) 134/390 (34.4%) 130/390 (33.3%) 0.95 (0.76–1.20) .67 0.96 (0.77–1.19) .68
 German cockroach positivity (asIgE > 0.35 kUa/L) 201/390 (51.5%) 192/390 (49.2%) 0.94 (0.80–1.11) .47 0.94 (0.79–1.11) .42
 Concentration of asIgE to Dermatophagoides (kUa/L)c GM: 0.158 GM: 0.129 0.78 (0.51–1.17) .22 0.77 (0.52–1.13) .17
 Concentration of asIgE to German cockroach (kUa/L)c GM: 0.342 GM: 0.289 0.82 (0.55–1.22) .31 0.81 (0.55–1.20) .28
Atopy (IgE detected by in house ELISA)
 Concentration of asIgE to Dermatophagoidesd GM: 60.3 GM: 73.8 1.13 (0.36–3.50) .83 1.17 (0.39–3.51) .78
 Concentration of asIgE to German cockroachd GM: 72.4 GM: 161.0 1.98 (0.59–6.63) .25 1.51 (0.45–5.04) .49

Abbreviations: asIgE, allergen-specific IgE; CI, confidence interval; ELISA, enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay; GM, geometric mean; GMR, geometric mean ratio; IgE, immunoglobulin E; RR, risk ratio; SPT, skin prick test positivity.

aAtopy outcomes assessed by IgE were adjusted for age and sex only.

bFor this outcome, a natural log transformation was applied to village-level proportions to correct skewed distributions, and the data in parentheses are the geometric means of village proportions.

cLog10(+0.001) transformation at the individual level.

dLog10(+1) transformation at the individual level.