Skip to main content
. 2018 Oct 12;68(10):1691–1698. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciy766

Table 4.

Paul et al [11] Desirability of Outcome Ranking Endpoint With Distribution by Treatment Group

Paul et al [11] DOOR Endpoint DOOR Distribution Partial Credit Score
Rank Alive How Many of the Following:
Treatment Failure
Infectious Complications
Grade 4 Adverse Events
TMP/SMX (n = 41) Vancomycin (n = 50) Scenario A Scenario B Scenario C Scenario D
1 Yes 0 of 3 16 (39%) 21 (42%) 100 100 100 100
2 Yes 1 of 3 9 (22%) 18 (36%) 100 0 100 75
3 Yes 2 of 3 2 (5%) 1 (2%) 100 0 0 50
4 Yes 3 of 3 0 (0%) 1 (2%) 100 0 0 25
5 No (death) Any 14 (34%) 9 (18%) 0 0 0 0
DOOR Results Partial Credit Results
Probability (95% CI) of a Higher DOOR Using TMP/SMX Therapy vs Vancomycin Therapy Estimated Between-treatment Partial Credit Difference a,b (95% CI)
A B C D
0.44 (0.32, 0.55) –16.2 (–34, 2) –3.0 (–24, 18) –17.0 (–36, 2) –12.6 (–29, 4)
P = .09 P = .83 P = .11 P = .28

DOOR probability and partial credit scenarios are presented.

Abbreviations: CI, confidence interval; DOOR, desirability of outcome ranking; SMX, sulfamethoxazole; TMP, trimethoprim.

a Estimated between-treatment difference is equal to mean TMP/SMX score minus mean vancomycin score.

b Exact Wilcoxon P values are presented for scenarios A through D. P values using t test ranged from 0.08 to 0.78.