Table 2.
Comparison between groups regarding their EF%, WMSI and diastolic dysfunction both at presentation and follow up.
| Group I n = 32 |
Group II n = 38 |
Group III n = 10 |
P value | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| • Ejection fraction % At presentation At follow up |
42 ± 7% 39 ± 13% |
53 ± 3% 58 ± 4% |
63 ± 4% 62 ± 4% |
0.001⁎ 0.001⁎⁎ 0.001⁎⁎⁎ 0.001⁎ 0.004⁎⁎ 0.001⁎⁎⁎ |
| • WMSI At presentation At follow up |
1.5 ± 0.2 1.6 ± 0.5 |
1.3 ± 0.1 1.1 ± 0.1 |
1.0 ± 0.0 1.0 ± 0.0 |
0.001⁎ 0.001⁎⁎ 0.001⁎⁎⁎ 0.001⁎ 0.001⁎⁎ 0.003⁎⁎⁎ |
| • Diastolic dysfunction At presentation, n (%) At follow up, n (%) |
27 (84%) 27 (84%) |
21 (55%) 19 (50%) |
0 (0%) 0 (0%) |
0.01⁎ 0.003⁎ |
⁎
P (group I versus II).
⁎⁎
P (group II versus III).
⁎⁎⁎
P (group I versus III).