Table 2.
Scale of relative importance (adapted from Saaty, 2008).
| Relative importance | Definition | Description |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Equal importance | Two indicators influence on objective equally |
| 3 | Moderate importance | Experience and judgement slightly favor one indicator over another |
| 5 | Strong importance | Experience and judgement strongly favor one indicator over another |
| 7 | Very strong importance | One decision indicator is favored strongly over another and its supremacy is established in practice |
| 9 | Extreme importance | The evidence favoring one decision indicator over another is of the highest possible order of validity |
| 2, 4, 6, 8 | Intermediate values between the two adjacent judgements | Compromise is needed |