Skip to main content
. 2017 Dec 14;31(5):760–782. doi: 10.1177/0898264317747077

Table 3.

Two-Parallel Process Positive Support and Depression.

All
Men
Women
Estimate (SE) Estimate (SE) Estimate (SE)
Positive support growth factors
 Intercept 7.96 (0.02) 8.21 (0.02) 7.68 (0.03)
 Intercept variance 1.67 (0.04) 0.92 (0.04) 2.36 (0.07)
 Slope (per 2 years) −0.01 (0.01)ns −0.00 (0.01)ns −0.01 (0.02)ns
 Slope variance (per 2 years) 0.03 (0.003) 0.03 (0.003) 0.04 (0.005)
Depressive symptoms growth factors
 Intercept 1.29 (0.02) 1.11 (0.02) 1.49 (0.03)
 Intercept variance 1.06 (0.03) 0.92 (0.04) 1.19 (0.05)
 Slope (per 2 years) 0.28 (0.04) 0.30 (0.07) 0.26 (0.05)
 Slope variance (per 2 years) 0.03 (0.004) 0.03 (0.004) 0.02 (0.006)
Standardized estimate (SE) Standardized estimate (SE) Standardized estimate (SE)
Associations between growth factors
 Intercept depression on positive support slope −0.21 (0.04) −0.20 (0.06) −0.21 (0.06)
 Intercept positive support on depression slope −0.26 (0.04) −0.20 (0.05) −0.31 (0.06)
 Depression slope with positive support slope −0.54 (0.08) −0.62 (0.11) −0.48 (0.14)
Model fit
 CFI .931 .925
 RMSEA .038 .039
N 7,171 7,171

Note. Adjusted for age, sex, education, ethnicity, government office region, wealth, and limiting long-standing illness, all mean centered. ns = nonsignificant; CFI = comparative fit index; RMSEA = root mean square error of approximation.