Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Jan 1.
Published in final edited form as: N C Med J. 2019 Jan-Feb;80(1):19–26. doi: 10.18043/ncm.80.1.19

Table 2.

Lung Cancer Screening Opinions by Provider Specialty

Statement Pulmonologists
N = 17
Primary Care
Providers
N = 72
P
value

N % N %

I am convinced that screening for lung cancer is beneficial for patients
 Strongly agree 6 35.3 4 5.8 < .001
 Agree 9 52.9 22 31.9
 Undecided 2 11.8 33 47.8
 Disagree 0 0 10 14.5
 Strongly disagree 0 0 0 0
Missing 0 3

Inconsistent recommendations about lung cancer screening make it difficult to decide whether or not to screen
 Strongly agree 2 11.8 8 11.4 .575
 Agree 5 29.4 34 48.6
 Undecided 2 11.8 7 10.0
 Disagree 7 41.2 18 25.7
 Strongly disagree 1 5.9 3 4.3
Missing 0 2

Screening for lung cancer is cost-effective
 Strongly agree 0 0 1 1.4 .026
 Agree 8 47.1 9 12.9
 Undecided 8 47.1 41 58.6
 Disagree 1 5.9 11 15.7
 Strongly disagree 0 0 8 11.4
Missing 0 2

I rely on the recommendations of local specialists regarding lung cancer screening in my practice
 Strongly agree 3 19.7 0 0 < .001
 Agree 9 52.9 16 23.2
 Undecided 0 0 12 17.4
 Disagree 5 29.4 35 50.7
 Strongly disagree 0 0 6 8.7
Missing 0 3

I have enough knowledge to explain the pros and cons of lung cancer screening to my patients
 Strongly agree 4 25.0 9 13.0 .221
 Agree 9 56.3 33 47.8
 Undecided 3 18.8 12 17.4
 Disagree 0 0 14 20.3
 Strongly disagree 0 0 1 1.5
Missing 1 3

Time restrictions during a patient’s clinic visit mean other presenting problems have higher priority than screening for lung cancer
 Strongly agree 2 11.8 10 14.7 .017
 Agree 5 29.4 36 52.9
 Undecided 7 41.2 8 11.8
 Disagree 2 11.8 14 20.6
 Strongly disagree 1 5.9 0 0
Missing 0 4