Cossette 2011.
Methods | Setting: Specialised cardiac hospital, Canada Recruitment: All smokers who were hospitalised were asked to participate by the study nurse (not selected by motivation) |
|
Participants | 40 current daily smokers with cardiovascular disease, 60% M, av. age 57. Most in preparation stage Therapists: nurse specialised in smoking cessation |
|
Interventions | All participants had 1 or more sessions with the study nurse during hospitalisation. Conditions differed after discharge 1. Intervention: 6 phone calls by study nurse at weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, 8, 12. If needed additional phone calls could be arranged between 3 and 6m post‐discharge. At week 3 appointment with the study nurse if requested by participant 2. Control: referral to a national quitline or a community centre for smoking cessation Pharmacotherapy: NRT, bupropion or varenicline were suggested during hospitalisation and follow‐up |
|
Outcomes | Self‐reported abstinence at 6 m (7‐day PP) Validation: only for 1 participant |
|
Notes | ||
Risk of bias | ||
Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
Random sequence generation (selection bias) | Unclear risk | Not specified, but generated by a centre for randomised controlled trials |
Allocation concealment (selection bias) | Unclear risk | Opaque sealed envelopes |
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) All outcomes | High risk | Self‐reported outcomes from participants not blinded to treatment condition. Level of personal contact differed between arms |
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes | Unclear risk | High loss to follow‐up, but missing data similar in both groups and analyses are ITT, participants lost to follow‐up considered smokers |