McBride 1999b.
Methods | Setting: 2 Health Maintenance Organisations, USA Recruitment: Pregnant women who had booked a prenatal appointment, by mail | |
Participants | 897 pregnant smokers and recent quitters (44% already quit) not selected for motivation to quit; av. age 28, av. cigs/day 15 before pregnancy, 5 if still smoking | |
Interventions | 1. S‐H booklet only 2. Prepartum intervention: 3 proactive TC calls av 8½ mins, approx 2 weeks after S‐H mailing, and 1 m and 2 m later. Tailored letter, S‐H book. After 28‐week follow‐up sent relapse prevention kit 3. Pre‐ and postpartum intervention: as 2, plus 3 calls within first 4 m postpartum, av 7.7 mins. 3 newsletters | |
Outcomes | Abstinence at 12 m postpartum (7‐day PP) Validation: Saliva cotinine requested by mail, < 20 ng/mL. Self‐reported rates used in analyses, no difference in confirmation rates between groups | |
Notes | Arms 3+2 vs 1, effect of TC versus S‐H only | |
Risk of bias | ||
Bias | Authors' judgement | Support for judgement |
Random sequence generation (selection bias) | Unclear risk | Randomised, method not described |
Allocation concealment (selection bias) | Unclear risk | No details given |
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) All outcomes | Low risk | Biochemical validation used, not reported: Quote: "since there were no between‐group differences in the proportion of saliva samples returned or the proportion confirmed, the primary trial outcomes were based on self‐reported smoking status." |
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) All outcomes | Low risk | Loss to follow‐up 13% at 12 m, not different by group, losses included as smokers |