Skip to main content
. 2019 May 2;2019(5):CD002850. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002850.pub4

Rigotti 2006.

Methods Setting: Prenatal care services, USA
 Recruitment: Pregnant women in a managed care plan or referred by a care provider, not selected by motivation
Participants 442 pregnant women smoking at least 1 cig in previous 7 days; av. age 29, av. cigs/day 21 prior to pregnancy, 10 at recruitment, 84% planned to quit
Interventions All participants received brief counselling at enrolment call and mailed a pregnancy‐tailored S‐H booklet
 1. Proactive counselling, up to 90 mins during pregnancy and 15 mins postpartum, + targeted written materials
 2. Usual care
Outcomes Abstinence 3 m postpartum (sustained at end of pregnancy and 3 m)
 Validation: saliva cotinine ≤ 20 ng/mL
Notes Mean of 5 calls received, 4 in pregnancy, av. 68 mins in total
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Low risk Quote: "computer‐generated randomization list arranged in balanced blocks of 4 and stratified by referral source"
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Low risk Quote: "... the application revealed the next assignment only after the smoker had consented to participate in the study"
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias) 
 All outcomes Low risk Biochemical validation; those who failed biochemical validation or did not provide a sample counted as smokers
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias) 
 All outcomes Low risk 21 miscarriages excluded. 33% Intervention, 28% Control lost to follow‐up, included as smokers