Table 2.
Estimated parameter values of the NDTD model using mean‐least squared fitting to the cell density data. Assays labelling is as in Table 1
| NDTD Model | Assay 1 J0 | Assay 1 J0 30 000 | Assay 1 J3J6 | Assay 2 J3 | Assay 2 J3J6 | Assay 3 J0 | Assay 3 J3 | Assay 4 J0 | Assay 4 J3 | Assay 4 J3J6 | Assay 3 J0 5% | Assay 3 J3 5% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| θ | 0.00E+00 | 1.64E–02 | 1.41E–02 | 1.15E–02 | 0.00E+00 | 7.85E–03 | 0.00E +00 | 2.10E–02 | 0.00E+00 | 3.36E–02 | 3.58E–02 | 4.30E–02 |
| β | 5.56E–01 | 6.20E–01 | 5.58E–01 | 6.66E–01 | 6.51E–01 | 5.03E–01 | 5.36E–01 | 6.91E–01 | 6.04E–01 | 6.23E–01 | 9.96E–01 | 1.01E+00 |
| k | 6.67E–01 | 8.31E–02 | 2.99E–01 | 1.23E–01 | 1.52E–01 | 2.01E+00 | 2.01E+00 | 0.00E+00 | 4.97E–01 | 0.00E+00 | 3.19E–01 | 7.77E–01 |
| α | 6.26E–03 | 1.31E–02 | 7.47E–03 | 1.44E–02 | 1.59E–02 | 2.29E–03 | 2.15E–03 | 2.26E–02 | 7.44E–03 | 1.80E–02 | 7.77E–03 | 3.48E–03 |
| RSS | 12.4 | 25 | 55.1 | 21.4 | 39.1 | 18.2 | 70.3 | 12.5 | 17.4 | 71.8 | 7.4 | 17.6 |
| AIC | 121.30 | 152.85 | 188.41 | 155.04 | 183.97 | 129.86 | 186.62 | 129.23 | 145.11 | 213.15 | 92.06 | 128.45 |
| SC | 128.52 | 160.08 | 195.64 | 162.53 | 191.46 | 136.81 | 193.57 | 136.72 | 152.60 | 220.63 | 99.01 | 135.40 |
| AIC | −2.00 | 10.22 | 3.02 | 4.88 | −2.00 | 1.75 | −2.00 | 32.60 | −2.00 | 26.12 | 4.21 | 21.64 |
| Variation | ||||||||||||
| SC | −3.81 | 8.41 | 1.21 | 3.01 | −3.87 | 0.01 | −3.74 | 30.73 | −3.87 | 24.25 | 2.48 | 19.90 |
| Variation | ||||||||||||