Skip to main content
. 2019 May 1;2019(5):CD004780. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004780.pub4

Comparison 14. Family therapy approaches vs psychological interventions (sugroup by age).

Outcome or subgroup title No. of studies No. of participants Statistical method Effect size
1 Remission post‐intervention 7 252 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 1.22 [0.89, 1.67]
1.1 Adult 3 76 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.89 [0.38, 2.07]
1.2 Adolescent 4 176 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 1.29 [0.87, 1.92]
2 Remission short‐term follow‐up 1 89 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 1.16 [0.94, 1.44]
2.1 Adolescent 1 89 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 1.16 [0.94, 1.44]
3 Remission long‐term follow‐up 6 200 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 1.08 [0.91, 1.28]
3.1 Adult (note russell is 5 year) 2 33 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.69 [0.39, 1.21]
3.2 Adolescent 4 167 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 1.13 [0.95, 1.34]
4 Dropouts during treatment 6 229 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 1.13 [0.46, 2.78]
4.1 Adult 3 80 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 1.45 [0.44, 4.70]
4.2 Adolescent 3 149 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 0.84 [0.18, 3.91]
5 Eating disorder psychopathology post‐intervention 7 262 Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI) 0.17 [‐0.32, 0.66]
5.1 Adult 3 85 Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI) ‐0.18 [‐0.70, 0.34]
5.2 Adolescent 4 177 Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI) 0.44 [‐0.28, 1.17]
6 Eating disorder psychopathology short‐term follow‐up (Lock 2010‐EDE) 1 89 Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI) ‐0.23 [‐0.69, 0.23]
6.1 Adolescent 1 89 Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI) ‐0.23 [‐0.69, 0.23]
7 Eating disorder psychopathology long‐term follow‐up 6 197 Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI) ‐0.01 [‐0.50, 0.47]
7.1 Adult 2 32 Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI) ‐0.57 [‐1.78, 0.65]
7.2 Adolescent 4 165 Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI) 0.16 [‐0.35, 0.68]
8 Weight (BMI, BMI%ile, %ABW) post‐intervention 6 210 Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI) 0.32 [0.01, 0.63]
8.1 Adult 2 32 Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI) ‐0.27 [‐1.10, 0.56]
8.2 Adolescent 4 178 Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI) 0.44 [0.14, 0.74]
9 Weight (BMI%ile) short‐term follow‐up 1 89 Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI) 2.30 [‐7.28, 11.88]
9.1 Adolescent 1 89 Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI) 2.30 [‐7.28, 11.88]
10 Weight (BMI, BMI%ile, %ABW) long‐term follow‐up 6 198 Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI) 0.14 [‐0.16, 0.45]
10.1 Adult 2 32 Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI) ‐0.50 [‐1.21, 0.21]
10.2 Adolescent 4 166 Std. Mean Difference (IV, Random, 95% CI) 0.27 [‐0.04, 0.57]
11 Relapse during treatment 4 101 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 1.06 [0.54, 2.08]
11.1 Adult 3 80 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 1.03 [0.44, 2.44]
11.2 Adolescent 1 21 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 1.1 [0.37, 3.27]
12 Relapse long‐term follow‐up 1 77 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 2.49 [0.55, 11.21]
12.1 Adolescent 1 77 Risk Ratio (M‐H, Random, 95% CI) 2.49 [0.55, 11.21]