Table 5.
Variables | Unadjusted HR (95% CI) | P Value | Adjusted HR (95% CI)* | P Value |
---|---|---|---|---|
Overall analysis | ||||
MACCE | 1.59 (1.01–2.50) | 0.043 | 1.55 (0.94–2.57) | 0.085 |
Cardiovascular death† | 0.80 (0.25–2.63) | 0.716 | ··· | ··· |
Myocardial infarction† | 0.54 (0.16–1.85) | 0.327 | ··· | ··· |
Stroke† | 1.93 (0.48–7.71) | 0.353 | ··· | ··· |
Ischemia‐driven revascularization | 1.57 (0.72–3.42) | 0.261 | 1.52 (0.65–3.56) | 0.334 |
Hospitalization for unstable angina | 1.89 (1.04–3.44) | 0.036 | 2.10 (1.09–4.05) | 0.027 |
Hospitalization for heart failure† | 0.97 (0.20–4.81) | 0.972 | ··· | ··· |
All repeat revascularization | 1.32 (0.75–2.35) | 0.340 | 1.51 (0.81–2.83) | 0.195 |
Composite of all events | 1.48 (0.99–2.21) | 0.057 | 1.54 (0.98–2.40) | 0.059 |
Landmark analysis (≤1 y) | ||||
MACCE | 1.27 (0.76–2.12) | 0.353 | 1.18 (0.67–2.09) | 0.575 |
Hospitalization for unstable angina | 1.62 (0.79–3.31) | 0.187 | 1.84 (0.84–4.03) | 0.130 |
Ischemic‐driven revascularization | 1.21 (0.48–3.07) | 0.688 | 1.27 (0.46–3.50) | 0.646 |
All repeat revascularization | 1.14 (0.61–2.14) | 0.682 | 1.41 (0.71–2.82) | 0.328 |
Composite of all events | 1.26 (0.81–1.96) | 0.310 | 1.28 (0.78–2.09) | 0.322 |
Landmark analysis (>1 y) | ||||
MACCE | 3.55 (1.20–10.56) | 0.023 | 3.87 (1.20–12.46) | 0.023 |
Hospitalization for unstable angina | 2.68 (0.87–8.21) | 0.085 | 2.82 (0.84–9.51) | 0.095 |
Ischemic‐driven revascularization | 2.92 (0.61–14.04) | 0.182 | 2.46 (0.46–13.26) | 0.295 |
All repeat revascularization | 2.85 (0.59–13.71) | 0.192 | 2.54 (0.47–13.73) | 0.278 |
Composite of all events | 3.30 (1.10–9.86) | 0.033 | 3.67 (1.13–11.95) | 0.031 |
HR indicates hazard ratio; MACCE, major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular event; OSA, obstructive sleep apnea; PCI, percutaneous coronary intervention.
Model adjusted for age, sex, body mass index, hypertension, and diabetes mellitus, clinical presentation (acute myocardial infarction vs unstable angina), PCI procedure, and minimum SaO2.
Multivariate Cox regression and landmark analysis was not done because of too few events.