Skip to main content
. 2018 Nov 7;10(3):753–759. doi: 10.1111/jdi.12957

Table 3.

Independent associations of potential risk factors with diabetic retinopathy in type 2 diabetes mellitus

Variables Model 1 Model 2 Model 3
OR (95% CI) P OR (95% CI) P OR (95% CI) P
Age 0.98 (0.97–0.99) 0.001 0.98 (0.97–0.99) 0.001 0.98 (0.97–0.99) 0.001
Duration 1.11 (1.09–1.13) <0.001 1.12 (1.10–1.14) <0.001 1.12 (1.10–1.14) <0.001
BMI 0.99 (0.96–1.02) 0.584 0.99 (0.96–1.02) 0.516 0.99 (0.96–1.02) 0.552
SBP 1.02 (1.01–1.03) <0.001 1.02 (1.01–1.03) <0.001 1.02 (1.01–1.03) <0.001
DBP 1.00 (0.98–1.01) 0.492 1.00 (0.98–1.01) 0.495 1.01 (0.98–1.01) 0.476
TG 0.93 (0.87–0.99) 0.030 0.93 (0.87–0.99) 0.031 0.93 (0.87–0.99) 0.027
HDL‐C 0.91 (0.65–1.27) 0.574 0.91 (0.65–1.28) 0.594 0.92 (0.66–1.30) 0.640
HbA1c 1.08 (1.02–1.14) 0.004 1.10 (1.05–1.16) <0.001 1.10 (1.04–1.15) <0.001
SD* 1.15 (1.03–1.29) 0.017 / / / /
CV* / / 1.07 (0.97–1.19) 0.194 / /
MAGE* / / / / 1.07 (0.96–1.19) 0.251

Model 1 is adjusted for age, duration, body mass index (BMI), systolic blood pressure (SBP), diastolic blood pressure (DBP), triglyceride (TG), high‐density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL‐C), glycated hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) and standard deviation (SD); model 2 is adjusted for age, duration, BMI, SBP, DBP, TG, HDL‐C, HbA1c and coefficient of variation (CV); model 3 is adjusted for age, duration, BMI, SBP, DBP, TG, HDL‐C, HbA1c and mean amplitude of glycemic excursions (MAGE). *Odds ratios and P‐values were calculated for each one standard deviation increase in SD, CV or MAGE. CI, confidence interval.