Skip to main content
. 2019 Apr 9;11:2849–2870. doi: 10.2147/CMAR.S185319

Table S2.

Survival rate and median survival according to diabetic status before and after propensity matching

Diabetic status Unmatched (complete) dataset Propensity score-matched (1:1) dataseta
PFS Median PFS (months) CSS Median CSS (months) PFS Median PFS (months) CSS Median CSS (months)
1-year 3-year 5-year 1-year 3-year 5-year 1-year 3-year 5-year 1-year 3-year 5-year
Whole cohort 76.9% 65.7% 59.3% - 91.0% 76.2% 72.8% - 73.5% 61.1% 52.8% 70.03 87.8% 67.8% 61.1% -
Diabetic group 67.0% 54.6% 44.7% 56.30 84.9% 55.1% 50.8% - 67.0% 54.6% 44.7% 56.30 84.9% 55.1% 50.8% -
Nondiabetic group 79.3% 68.4% 62.2% - 92.5% 81.0% 77.8% - 79.7% 67.4% 59.2% - 90.7% 76.9% 71.6% -

Note: aPropensity score-matched (1:1, 109 pairs) analyses were performed with a small caliper of 0.1 for matching potential confounders including sex, age, stage, ECOG PS, extranodal site(s), Hans classification, symptoms and LDH level. p-values in bold < 0.05.

Abbreviations: LDH, lactate dehydrogenase; ECOG, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group; PS, performance status; PFS, progression-free survival; CSS, cancer-specific survival.