. 2019 Apr 30;5(4):e01583. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2019.e01583

Table 1.

Results of the statistical analyses performed on RTs when trials contaminated by eye-movements were included in the mean RT calculation, and when those trials were removed from the mean RT calculation.

	Eye-movements included (RT_EM)	Eye-movements removed (RT_NEM)
Main effect of congruency (Gaze-cuing effect)	F(1,31) = 91.70, MSE = 1017.70, p < .001, η_p² = .75	F(1,31) = 98.99, MSE = 802.23, p < .001, η_p² = .76
Main effect of SOA	F(2.02,62.34) = 75.97, MSE = 603.84, p < .001, η_p² = .71	F(1.69,52.25) = 161.34, MSE = 241.66, p < .001, η_p² = .84
Congruency by SOA interaction	F(2.02,62.53) = 4.09, MSE = 317.14, p = .021, η_p² = .12	F(3,93) = 5.52, MSE = 61.05, p = .002, η_p² = .15
Main effect of emotion	F(2.36,73.25) = 9.80, MSE = 378.15, p < .001, η_p² = .24	F(3,93) = 16.59, MSE = 104.95, p < .001, η_p² = .35
Emotion by SOA Interaction	F(3.24,100.36) = 1.17, MSE = 550.36, p = .32, η_p² = .036	F(5.33,165.18) = .56, MSE = 101.25, p = .73, η_p² = .018
Congruency by emotion by SOA interaction	F(3.69, 114.46) = 1.36, MSE = 525.86, p = .26, η_p² = .04	F(5.56, 172.30) = 1.51, MSE = 109.16, p = .18, η_p² = .047
Emotion by congruency interaction (Emotional modulation of gaze-cuing)	F(2.22, 68.77) = 8.79, MSE = 252.78, p < .001, η_p² = .22 Congruent trials only: F(2.16, 67.08) = 7.33, MSE = 473.54, p = .001, η_p² = .19 Fear < Classic neutral (p = .039) Fear < Neutral tongue (p = .001) Happy < Neutral tongue (p = .001) Incongruent trials only: F(2.34, 72.60) = 14.38, MSE = 183.40, p < .001, η_p² = .32 Fear < Classic neutral (p = .017) Happy < Classic neutral (p = .001) Neutral tongue < Classic neutral (p < .001) Happy < Fear (p = .001) Gaze-cuing effect (incongruent – congruent): Fear > Happy (p = .002) Fear > Neutral tongue (p < .001) Classic Neutral > Neutral tongue (p = .046)	F(3, 93) = 25.79, MSE = 53.72, p < .001, η_p² = .45 Congruent trials only: F(3,93) = 17.76, MSE = 84.57, p < .001, η_p² = .36 Fear < Classic neutral (p = .001) Fear < Neutral tongue (p < .001) Happy < Neutral tongue (p < .001) Happy < Classic neutral (p = .024) Incongruent trials only: F(3, 93) = 21.93, MSE = 74.10, p < .001, η_p² = .41 Fear < Classic neutral (p = .004) Happy < Classic neutral (p < .001) Neutral tongue < Classic neutral (p < .001) Happy < Fear (p = .002) Gaze-cuing effect (incongruent – congruent): Fear > Happy (p < .001) Fear > Neutral tongue (p < .001) Classic Neutral > Neutral tongue (p < .001) Classic Neutral > Happy (p = .017) Happy > Neutral Tongue (p = .010)

Notes: All pairwise comparisons are Bonferroni corrected.