Skip to main content
. 2019 Apr 26;10:901. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00901

TABLE 2.

Standardized path coefficients in the structural model showing direct and indirect relationships between personality, insomnia, anxiety, and depression (N = 2962).

Direct relations
Indirect relations through insomnia
Outcome Predictor β SE 95% CI β SE 95% CI RIT
Insomnia Neuroticism 0.42*** 0.03 (0.36, 0.48)
Extraversion 0.02 0.03 (−0.03, 0.08)
Conscientiousness -0.05 0.04 (−0.12, 0.02)
Anxiety Neuroticism 0.59*** 0.03 (0.53, 0.66) 0.08*** 0.01 (0.05, 0.10) 0.11
Extraversion 0.04 0.03 (−0.01, 0.09) 0.01 0.01 (−0.01, 0.02) 0.10
Conscientiousness -0.02 0.03 (−0.09, 0.05) -0.01 0.01 (−0.02, 0.00) 0.30
Insomnia 0.18*** 0.03 (0.12, 0.24)
Age 0.04 0.02 (−0.01, 0.08)
Gendera -0.04 0.02 (−0.08, 0.01)
Depression Neuroticism 0.39*** 0.04 (0.32, 0.46) 0.11*** 0.02 (0.08, 0.14) 0.22
Extraversion -0.05 0.03 (−0.10, 0.01) 0.01 0.01 (−0.01, 0.02) 0.15
Conscientiousness -0.02 0.04 (−0.09, 0.05) -0.01 0.01 (−0.03, 0.01) 0.39
Insomnia 0.26*** 0.03 (0.20, 0.31)
Age 0.14*** 0.02 (0.10, 0.18)
Gendera -0.06** 0.02 (−0.11, −0.02)

The covariance of the error terms of anxiety and depression was 0.57. RIT, ratio of indirect to total effect, CI, confidence interval. aMale = 1, female = 2. *p < 0.05, ∗∗p < 0.01, ∗∗∗p < 0.001.