Skip to main content
. 2019 Apr 26;10:383. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2019.00383

Table 1.

Pairwise comparison of overall cARI between CMA estimates (100 simulations of 1000 individuals).

CMA comparison Diff (95% CI) p adj
LCMA2 : LCMA1-thr 0.22 (0.18–0.25) < 2.2 × 10-16
LCMA2 : LCMA2-thr 0.20 (0.17–0.24) < 2.2 × 10-16
LCMA2 : LCMA1 0.12 (0.08–0.15) < 2.2 × 10-16
LCMA1 : LCMA1-thr 0.10 (0.07–0.14) < 2.2 × 10-16
LCMA1 : LCMA2-thr 0.09 (0.05–0.12) < 1.2 × 10-8
LCMA2-thr : LCMA1-thr 0.02 (–0.02–0.05) 0.65

Diff: Difference in overall adjusted Rand Index, CI: confidence interval, p adj: P-values adjusted for multiple comparison, thr: Threshold, indicating the dichotomized LCMA estimates.