Skip to main content
. 2019 May 2;5(8):e190260. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2019.0260

Table. Comparison of Cancer Radiotherapy Site-Specific and General Consent Form Readability by 7 Readability Indices.

Readability Score P Value
Across Consent Forms Pairwise Comparison Between Consent Formsa Brain vs General Medical General RT vs General Medical
Breast vs Brain Breast vs General RT Breast vs General Medical Brain vs General RT
DRP (GE) .003 .98 .02 .06 .04 .11 .95
FK <.001 .99 <.001 .007 <.001 .009 .95
FORCAST .31 NA NA NA NA NA NA
Fry .048 .91 .55 .03 .94 .11 .18
GF .001 .99 .002 .22 .01 .36 .96
Raygor .29 NA NA NA NA NA NA
SMOG <.001 .99 <.001 .008 <.001 .007 .96

Abbreviations: DRP (GE), Degrees of Reading Power (Grade Equivalent); FK, Flesch-Kincaid; FORCAST, Ford, Caylor, Sticht; GF, Gunning Fog; NA, not applicable; RT, radiotherapy; SMOG, Simple Measure of Gobbledygook.

a

P values for comparison across the four consent forms determined using analysis of variance (ANOVA). P values for pairwise comparisons between forms was determined using the Tukey test for readability scores with significant difference (P < .05) across the forms on ANOVA. Significant Tukey results are P < .05. In all significant pairwise comparisons, site-specific (breast or brain) readability scores were lower (easier to read) than those for general (general RT or general medical) forms.