Skip to main content
. 2019 Apr 26;11:3603–3609. doi: 10.2147/CMAR.S197496

Table 5.

The impact of MRI on the individual staging parameters (95%CI)

AUC (95%CI) Sensitivity (95%CI) Specificity (95%CI) PPV (95%CI) NPV (95%CI)
Maximal tumor diameter
Without MRI 0.58 (0.55–0.62) 21.0% (14.9–28.2) 95.9% (94.4–97.2) 48.5% (36.2–61.0) 86.9%(84.6–89.0)
With MRI 0.81 (0.78–0.83) 65.0% (57.0–72.4) 96.5% (95.1–97.6) 77.3% (69.2–84.1) 93.8% (92.0–95.3)
Vaginal invasion
Without MRI 0.61 (0.58–0.64) 48.7% (32.4–65.2) 72.9% (70.0–75.6) 6.7% (4.1–10.3) 97.3% (95.8–98.3)
With MRI 0.57 (0.54–0.60) 25.6% (13.0–42.1) 88.4% (86.3–90.4) 8.1% (4.0–14.4) 96.8% (95.4–97.8)
Parametrium infiltration
MRI 0.56 (0.53–0.59) 16.7% (4.7–37.4) 95.3% (93.8–96.5) 7.8% (2.2–18.9) 97.9% (96.8–98.7)

Abbreviations: MRI, magnetic resonance imaging; PPV, positive predictive value; NPV, negative predictive value.