Skip to main content
NIHPA Author Manuscripts logoLink to NIHPA Author Manuscripts
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 Feb 13.
Published in final edited form as: Org Biomol Chem. 2019 Feb 13;17(7):1787–1790. doi: 10.1039/c8ob02600a

An enantioselective synthesis of α-alkylated pyrroles via cooperative isothiourea/palladium catalysis.

W Rush Scaggs a, Toya D Scaggs a, Thomas N Snaddon a
PMCID: PMC6499370  NIHMSID: NIHMS999567  PMID: 30483696

Abstract

Herein we describe the direct enantioselective Lewis base/Pd catalysed α-allylation of pyrrole acetic acid esters. This provides high isolated yields of highly enantioenriched products and exhibits broad reaction scope with respect to both reaction partners. The products can be readily elaborated in a manner which points towards potential applications in target directed synthesis.


A large number of natural and designed molecules possess an alkyl-bearing stereogenic centre next to the 2-position of the pyrrole ring. This is exemplified by the pyrrolidizine alkaloid dehydroretronecine 11 and the commercial analgesic α-ketorolac 3 (Figure 1),2 but also extends to the indolizidine alkaloid tashiromine 23 and the complex naturally-occurring chemotherapeutic mitomycin C 4,4 where the corresponding pyrrolidine framework might reasonably be accessed via directed reduction of an appropriate α-chiral pyrrole precursor scaffold.5

Figure 1.

Figure 1.

Representative natural products and pharmaceuticals possessing the α-alkyl 2-pyrrole substructure.

Our laboratory has continued interest in the potential of cooperative Lewis base/transition metal-catalysed reactions as a means to prepare important yet synthetically challenging molecular scaffolds in enantioenriched form. Our prior efforts in this area have established C1-ammonium enolates as effective nucleophiles for transition metal electrophiles such as cationic π(ally)Pd intermediates.6,7 Critical to the demonstrated efficiency and generality of this cooperative two-catalyst construct is the separation of the source of enantiocontrol (administered by the Lewis base) from the Pd centre. This permits the reactivity of the Pd-catalyst to modified and modulated without compromising the levels of enantioselectivity and is therefore complementary to existing asymmetric transition metal catalysis, which relies on ligand-centred stereocontrol.6

Driven by the clear value of synthetic access to α-chiral 2-pyrrole acetic acids we expected that C1-ammonium enolates derived from pyrrole-acetic acid esters would engage a wide range of π(allyl)Pd electrophiles to provide a general method by which to prepare these valuable scaffolds (Figure 1, 5). While C1-ammonium enolates have a prodigious history as ester enolate equivalents in asymmetric Lewis base catalysis,8 only recently have these species been directed toward the preparation of important α-chiral pyrrole scaffolds. In seminal advances, Smith and colleagues have described enantioselective isothiourea Lewis base catalysed Michael addition reactions of C1-ammonium enolates derived from pyrrole-containing carboxylic acids 6 and 9 (Scheme 1, a and b).9 Firstly, a one pot intramolecular Michael addition/lactonization/ring opening sequence provides ready access to useful 5/5 bicyclic pyrrole scaffolds reminiscent of pyrrolizidine alkaloids in high yield and with high levels of diastereo- and enantioselectivity (Scheme 1a).9a Secondly, enantioselective intermolecular Michael addition to acceptor 10 proceeded via a similar mechanism to provide products 11 bearing trans-configured vicinal stereocentres.9b The significance of this latest study is further enhanced as it is the first report of α-nitrogenous C1-ammonium enolates being successfully prepared and utilized via isothiourea Lewis base catalysis. Inspired by these reports and recognizing the modularity of our cooperative catalysis framework we sought to prepare useful scaffolds 5 (Figure 1) via direct enantioselective α-functionalization of pyrrole-2-acetic acid esters.

Scheme 1.

Scheme 1.

Current and proposed methods using pyrrole-substituted C1-ammonium enolates.

We began by evaluating the direct allylation of N-methyl-2-pyrrole Pfp ester 16 with allyl mesylate 18 (Scheme 2). Our original conditions6a employing Birman’s benzotetramisole 810 in combination with Buchwald’s 3rd generation Xantphos-ligated Pd precatalyst11 have proven very effective for a range of nucleophile/electrophile combinations and, as expected, these provided desired product 17 in high isolated yield and with excellent levels of enantioselectivity (81%, 98:2 er). Noteworthy is the lack of allylated pyrrole products that would arise from the electron-rich N-methylpyrrole serving as a competitive nucleophile.12 Encouraged by this we surveyed the effect of N-substitution; N-benzyl 19, p-methoxybenzyl 20 and 3,4-dimethoxybenzyl 21 substituents functioned with comparable efficiency as did N-allyl substituted nucleophiles 2224, and the more sterically demanding N-iPr substituted pyrrole 25. Finally, the unsubstituted pyrrole 26 also gave the expected product albeit with lower efficiency and more modest enantioselectivity.

Scheme 2.

Scheme 2.

Evaluation of N-substituent.

Having established the efficacy of various N-substituted 2-pyrrole acetic acid Pfp ester nucleophiles, we moved to assess the scope of electrophiles. We have previously established the versatility of the asymmetric cooperative catalysis protocol via alteration of the supporting ligand on Pd to accommodate disparate electronic and steric changes to the allyl electrophile. Accordingly, we assessed the enantioselective allylation of 16 with various allyl electrophiles 28 in combination with the appropriate phosphine ligand (Scheme 3). In each case a comprehensive optimisation of stoichiometry was conducted (see Supplementary Information for details) Cinnamyl electrophiles 29 and 30 gave the linear products in high yields and with high levels of enantioselectivity. Brominated thiophene-containing product 31 indicated the tolerance of S-heterocycles and aryl bromides to these conditions. A variety of 2-substututed electrophiles 3235 was also well tolerated, as were ester (3739), secondary amide (4041) and Weinreb amide (42) substituted electrophiles. Amides 4042 were obtained as single E isomers. Incorporation of BPin (43) and PhMe2Si (44) substituents was also possible, which provides opportunity for further functionalization via Suzuki–Miyaura6b,13 and Hiyama–Denmark cross-coupling,6d,14 respectively. Finally, nucleophile 16 could also be directly benzylated using a 2-naphthyl(diphenyl)phosphate partner giving 45.6c

Scheme 3.

Scheme 3.

Evaluation of electrophile scope.

Having demonstrated the efficient formation of enantioenriched pyrrole-bearing stereogenic centres we sought to demonstrate the useful synthetic elaboration of these products without loss of enantioselectivity. Beginning with Pfp ester 24 (Scheme 4a), transesterification to methyl ester 46, hydrolysis to afford carboxylic acid 47, and reduction to the corresponding alcohol 48 all proceeded without loss of enantioselectivity.6,7b Secondly, we considered the ubiquity of bicyclic pyrroles and pyrrolidines in alkaloid natural products and sought to elaborate our products into related motifs. In relation to this goal, bicyclic pyrrole 50 was prepared via a straightforward two step transesterification/ring closing metathesis sequence from 22 without loss in enantioselectivity (Scheme 4b).15 Finally, we sought to evaluate this method on more complex pyrrole nucleophiles and prepared 53 via the enantioselective α-allylation of functionalized pyrrole acetic acid ester 52, prepared from the NSAID tolmetin (Scheme 4c).

Scheme 4.

Scheme 4.

Elaboration of products.

Conclusions

In conclusion, we have described the direct enantioselective α-allylation of 2-pyrrole acetic acid esters via cooperative Lewis base/Pd catalysis. The products are obtained in high yield and enantioselectivity using a range of structurally different nucleophiles and electrophiles and could be modified and elaborated without loss in optical purity. The preparation of bicycle 50 is noteworthy as it demonstrates straightforward access to enantioenriched bicyclic pyrroles and validates the potential suitability of this method to the synthesis of relevant alkaloid natural products. Finally, the enantioselective functionalization of tolmetin-Pfp ester 52 extends our method to more complex pyrrole nucleophiles.

Supplementary Material

esi
esi2

Acknowledgements

We gratefully acknowledge Indiana University and the NIH (R01GM121573) for generous financial support. We thank Dr. Maren Pink and Dr. Chun-Hsing Chen (IU) for X-ray crystallography. This project was partially supported by the IU Vice Provost for Research through the Research Equipment Fund.

Footnotes

Footnotes relating to the title and/or authors should appear here.

Electronic Supplementary Information (ESI) available: [details of any supplementary information available should be included here]. See DOI: 10.1039/x0xx00000x

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts to declare.

Notes and references

‡ Footnotes relating to the main text should appear here. These might include comments relevant to but not central to the matter under discussion, limited experimental and spectral data, and crystallographic data.

  • 1.Hartmann T Planta, 1999, 207, 483–495. [Google Scholar]
  • 2.Gusman A, Yuste F, Toscano RA and Young JM, J. Med. Chem 1986, 29, 589–591. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 3.(a) Ohmiya S, Kubo H, Otomasu H, Saito K and Murakoshi I, Hetereocycles 1990, 30, 537–542; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Kiss L, Forro E and Fülöp F, Beilstein J. Org. Chem 2015, 11, 596–603. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 4.Bass PD, Gubler DA, Judd TC and Williams RM, Chem. Rev 2013, 113, 6816–6863. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 5.For selected representative examples, see:Ortiz C and Greenhouse R, Tetrahedron Lett 1985, 26, 2831–2832;Conrad JC, Kong J, Laforteza BN and MacMillan DWC, J. Am. Chem. Soc 2009, 131, 11640–11641;Hildebrandt S, Schacht JH and Gansäuer A, Synthesis, 2017, 49, 2943–2948.
  • 6.(a) Hutchings-Goetz L, Yang C and Snaddon TN, ACS Catalysis, 2018, 8, 10537–10544; [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Scaggs WR, and Snaddon TN, Chem. Eur. J 2018, 24, 14378–14381; [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (c) Schwarz KJ, Yang C, Fyfe JWB, and Snaddon TN, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed 2018, 57, 12102–12105; [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (d) Schwarz KJ, Pearson CM, Cintro-Rosado G, Liu P and Snaddon TN, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed 2018, 57, 7800–7803; [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (e) Fyfe JWB, Kabia OM, Pearson CM and Snaddon TN, Tetrahedron 2018, 74, 5383–5391; [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (f) Schwarz KJ, Amos JL, Klein JC, Do D and Snaddon TN, J. Am. Chem. Soc 2016, 138, 5214–5217. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 7.For other examples of C1-ammonium enolates in conjunction with transition metal catalysis, see:Spoehrle SS, West TH, Taylor JE, Slawin AMZ and Smith AD, J. Am. Chem. Soc 2017, 139, 11895–11902;Jiang Z, Beiger JJ and Hartwig JF, J. Am. Chem. Soc 2017, 139, 87–90.Lu X, Ge L, Cheng C, Chen J, Cao W and Wu X, Chem. Eur. J 2017, 23, 7689–7693;Song J, Zhang Z-J and Gong L-Z, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed 2017, 56, 5212–5216;Song J, Zhang Z-J, Chen S-S, Fan T and Gong L-Z, J. Am. Chem. Soc 2018, 140, 3177–3180.
  • 8.For reviews, see:Morrill LC and Smith AD, Chem. Soc. Rev 2014, 43, 6214–6226;Paull DH, Weatherwax A, and Lectka T, Tetrahedron 2009, 65, 6771–6803;France S, Guerin DJ, Miller SJ and Lectka T, Chem. Rev 2003, 103, 2985–3012.
  • 9.(a) Stark DG, Williamson P, Gayner ER, Musolino SF, Kerr RWF, Taylor JE, Slawin AMZ, O’Riordan TJC, Macgregor SA and Smith AD, Org. Biomol. Chem 2016, 14, 8957–8965; [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Zhang S, Taylor JE, Slawin AMZ and Smith AD, Org. Lett 2018, 20, 5482–5485. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 10.Liu P, Yang X, Birman VB and Houk KN, Org. Lett 2012, 14, 3288–3291;Bumbu VD and Birman VB, J. Am. Chem. Soc 2011, 133, 13902–13905;Yang X, Lu G and Birman VB, Org. Lett 2010, 12, 892–895;Birman VB and Li X, Org. Lett 2006, 8, 1351–1354.For a comprehensive discussion of isothioureas as enantioselective Lewis base catalysts, see:Merad J, Pons J-M, Chuzel O and Bressy C, Eur. J. Org. Chem 2016, 5589–5560.
  • 11.Bruno NC, Tudge MT and Buchwald SL, Chem. Sci 2013, 4, 916–920. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 12.For selected examples, see:Liu Y, Cao Z and Du H, J. Org. Chem 2012, 77, 4479–4483;Trost BM, Osipov M and Dong G, Org. Lett 2012, 14, 2254–2257;Cao Z, Liu Y, Liu Z, Feng X, Zhuang M and Du H, Org. Lett, 2011, 13, 2164–2167.
  • 13.For reviews, see:Miyaura N and Suzuki A, Chem. Rev 1995, 95, 2457–2483;Lennox AJJ and Lloyd-Jones GC, Chem. Soc. Rev 2014, 43, 412–443.For selected mechanistic studies, see:Thomas AA, Zahrt AF, Delaney CP and Denmark SE, J. Am. Chem. Soc 2018, 140, 4401–4416;Molloy JJ, Seath CP, West MJ, McLaughlin C, Fazakerley NJ, Kennedy AR, Nelson DJ, and Watson AJB, J. Am. Chem. Soc 2018, 140, 126–130Thomas AA, Wang H, Zahrt AF and Denmark SE, J. Am. Chem. Soc 2017, 139, 3805–3821;Thomas AA and Denmark SE, Science 2016, 352, 329–332;Lennox AJJ and Lloyd-Jones GC, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed 2013, 52, 7362–7370; Angew. Chem. 2013, 125, 7506–7515;
  • 14.(a) Denmark SE and Liu JH-C, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed 2010, 49, 2978–2986; [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (b) Sore HF, Galloway WRJD and Spring DR, Chem. Soc. Rev 2012, 41, 1845–1866; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (c) Nakao Y and Hiyama T, Chem. Soc. Rev 2011, 40, 4893–4901; [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]; (d) McLaughlin MJ, McAdam CA and Cook MJ, Org. Lett 2015, 17, 10–13. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • 15.Albano VG, Gualandi A, Monari M and Savoia D, J. Org. Chem 2008, 73, 8376–8381. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Associated Data

This section collects any data citations, data availability statements, or supplementary materials included in this article.

Supplementary Materials

esi
esi2

RESOURCES