Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 Sep 10.
Published in final edited form as: Angew Chem Int Ed Engl. 2018 Aug 20;57(37):12102–12105. doi: 10.1002/anie.201806742

Table 1:

Optimization studies.

graphic file with name nihms-1023823-t0006.jpg
Entry[a] X Ar Solvent Yield [%][b] er[c]
1 OTs 1 THF  0
2 OAc 1 THF  0
3 OCO2tBu 1 THF  0
4 OP(O)(OEt)2 1 THF  5
5 OP(O)(OPh)2 1 THF 68 97:3
6 OP(O)(OPh)2 1 1,4-dioxane 60 93:7
7 OP(O)(OPh)2 1 CH2Cl2 40 89:11
8 OP(O)(OPh)2 1 toluene 85 (81) 99:1
9 OP(O)(OPh)2 2 toluene 82 94:6
10 OP(O)(OPh)2 3 toluene 21
11 OP(O)(OPh)2 4 toluene  0
12 OP(O)(OPh)2 5 toluene 75 99:1
13 OP(O)(OPh)2 6 toluene  0
[a]

Reactions performed on 0.1 mmol scale.

[b]

Yields determined by 1H NMR analysis using 1,2,4,5-tetramethylbenzene as an internal standard. Yields of isolated products given in parentheses.

[c]

Determined by HPLC analysis on a chiral stationary phase.

Ms= methane-sulfonyl, Pfp = pentafluorophenyl.

graphic file with name nihms-1023823-t0005.jpg