Skip to main content
. 2018 Aug 3;53(6):515–526. doi: 10.1093/abm/kay063

Table 4.

Multiple logistic regression model for metabolic syndrome using HF-HRV cluster as independent variable and sex as moderator

OR (95% CI) p
Sex × HF Cluster .005
 Cluster 2 vs. Cluster 1 within female 2.30 (1.30–4.07) .004
 Cluster 3 vs. Cluster 1 within female 2.57 (1.22–5.41) .01
 Cluster 2 vs. Cluster 3 within female 0.90 (0.44–1.84) .77
 Cluster 2 vs. Cluster 1 within male 0.69 (0.46–1.02) .06
 Cluster 3 vs. Cluster 1 within male 0.59 (0.35–1.00) .05
 Cluster 2 vs. Cluster 3 within male 1.16 (0.69–1.92) .58
Cluster .40
Sex (male vs. female)ψ 1.32 (0.92–1.90) .13
Age (1 SD=7.0 year increase in age) 1.02 (0.86–1.19) .85
Presence of CAD 0.94 (0.66–1.33) .72
BMI (1 SD=5.3 kg/m2 increase in BMI) 3.50 (2.80–4.37) <.001
Exercise (hours/week) (1 SD=3.6 hour increase in exercise) 0.91 (0.78–1.05) .21
Household income
 $40 000–59,999 vs. ≤$39,999 0.83 (0.52–1.32) .42
 $60,000–99,999 vs. ≤$39,999 0.68 (0.43–1.07) .09
 ≥$100,000 vs. ≤$39,999 0.59 (0.36–0.97) .04
Years of school 0.94 (0.77–1.10) .43
Medication influencing MetS parameters 1.29 (0.78–2.13) .32
Other medications 1.54 (0.76–3.11) .23
Presence of comorbid medical conditions 1.52 (1.11–2.07) <.01
Sex hormone therapy 0.62 (0.30–1.25) .18

OR = odds ratio, CI = confidence interval, SBP = systolic blood pressure, BMI = body mass index, CAD = coronary artery disease.