Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2020 May 7.
Published in final edited form as: J Am Coll Cardiol. 2019 Mar 17;73(17):2123–2132. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2019.02.010

Table 3.

Estimated Effect of TMVr on KCCQ-OS at 1-Year Among Key Patient Subgroups

n TMVr Mean Standard Care Mean Mean Difference (95% CI) Interaction P-Value
Age 0.24
 <74 years 297 71.1 56.4 14.7 (9.6 to 19.8)
 ≥74 years 317 68.3 54.3 14.1 (9.0 to 19.2)
Sex 0.67
 Male 393 70.9 55.5 15.3 (10.8 to 19.8)
 Female 221 67.7 54.8 12.8 (6.8 to 18.8)
Chronic lung disease 0.33
 Yes 143 62.3 48.3 14.0 (6.3 to 21.8)
 No 471 71.9 57.5 14.4 (10.3 to 18.5)
Cause of cardiomyopathy 0.02
 Ischemic 373 70.5 52.3 18.3 (13.6 to 22.9)
 Nonischemic 241 68.3 60.6 8.4 (2.7 to 14.1)
Left ventricular end diastolic volume index 0.27
 <94 mL/m2 269 66.2 51.9 14.3 (8.9 to 19.7)
 ≥94 mL/m2 298 72.3 57.0 15.3 (10.1 to 20.4)
Severity of MR 0.64
 ERO <0.4 cm2 325 70.7 56.0 14.7 (9.8 to 19.6)
 ERO ≥0.4 cm2 266 68.7 53.3 15.3 (9.8 to 20.9)
Walk speed 0.90
 <0.8 m/s 268 65.2 50.3 14.9 (9.3 to 20.5)
 ≥0.8 m/s 343 73.0 59.5 13.5 (8.9 to 18.1)
ADL dependency 0.80
 Yes 107 60.2 42.6 17.6 (8.6 to 26.6)
 No 505 71.5 58.0 13.4 (9.6 to 17.3)

TMVr, transcatheter mitral valve repair; KCCQ, Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire; MR, mitral regurgitation; ERO, effective orifice area; ADL, activity of daily living.