Table 4.

In order to compare the two reading methodologies, the readers’ performance was assessed via AUC compared to their control reads summarized in Table 3. None of the readers attained statistical significance when utilizing sequential reads, while all readers were significantly better when utilizing an independent reader strategy

Radiologist ID	Sequential read AUC, 95% CI	P value CR vs SR two-tailed alpha = 0.05	Independent read AUC, 95% CI	P value CR vs IR two-tailed alpha = 0.05
1	0.7935 [0.7567–0.8229]	0.235	0.8213 [0.7861–0.8516]	0.0285*
2	0.7674 [0.7327–0.8001]	0.601	0.8305 [0.7982–0.8594]	0.00155*
3	0.7859 [0.7527–0.8174]	0.0532	0.7988 [0.7632–0.8310]	0.0160*

*Significant