Skip to main content
. 2018 Mar 9;58(3):1125–1136. doi: 10.1007/s00394-018-1630-4

Table 4.

Multivariable HRs with 95% CIs for the associations between intake of SFA from different food sources (en %) and incidence of type 2 diabetes in 37,421 participants from the EPIC-NL cohort

SFA from: Median intake en%/day SDa Model 1b Model 2c Model 3d Model 4e Model 5f
Butter 0.67 1.44 0.96 (0.89, 1.03) 0.88 (0.82, 0.95) 0.90 (0.84, 0.97) 0.93 (0.86, 1.01) 0.93 (0.86, 1.01)
Cheese 2.33 1.98 0.93 (0.87, 1.00) 0.89 (0.83, 0.95) 0.94 (0.88, 1.01) 0.86 (0.79, 0.93) 0.90 (0.83, 0.98)
Milk and milk products 2.30 1.47 1.10 (1.03, 1.17) 1.02 (0.95, 1.09) 0.99 (0.92, 1.05) 0.96 (0.89, 1.04) 1.01 (0.93, 1.10)
Meat 2.53 1.47 1.22 (1.15, 1.29) 1.23 (1.17, 1.31) 1.20 (1.13, 1.28) 1.10 (1.02, 1.19) 1.03 (0.95, 1.11)
Cakes and cookies 0.81 0.84 1.02 (0.95, 1.08) 0.88 (0.82, 0.95) 0.89 (0.83, 0.96) 0.94 (0.87, 1.01) 0.97 (0.90, 1.05)
Snacks 0.30 0.40 0.71 (0.65, 0.77) 1.00 (0.92, 1.09) 1.01 (0.93, 1.10) 0.96 (0.87, 1.06) 0.90 (0.81, 1.00)
Hard, solid fats 1.02 1.27 1.13 (1.07, 1.20) 1.05 (0.99, 1.12) 0.98 (0.92, 1.05) 0.96 (0.89, 1.04) 0.98 (0.91, 1.06)
Soft, liquid fats 0.59 0.51 1.16 (1.09, 1.23) 1.11 (1.04, 1.18) 1.12 (1.06, 1.19) 1.08 (0.99, 1.16) 1.08 (1.01, 1.17)
Others 2.57 1.08 0.79 (0.73, 0.85) 0.98 (0.90, 1.05) 1.00 (0.92, 1.08) 0.95 (0.86, 1.06) 0.96 (0.87, 1.06)

Obtained from Cox proportional hazards regression models. EPIC-NL, European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition-Netherlands

aHRs are expressed per SD en%

bCrude model; adjusted for total energy intake

cAdjustment for sex, age and sum of other SFA

dAdditional adjustments for education level, energy-adjusted alcohol consumption level, smoking status, physical activity level

eAdditional adjustments for energy-adjusted intake of animal protein, vegetable protein, trans fatty acids, vitamin E, dietary fibre and cholesterol

fAdditional adjustments for BMI and waist circumference