Skip to main content
. 2019 Feb 7;224(3):1359–1375. doi: 10.1007/s00429-018-01821-5

Table 1.

Results of conjunction analysis

Clusters Size t value x y z Area
Right cerebellar cluster 1630 10.41 14 − 46 − 22 Lobule V (Hem)
9.38 24 − 46 − 28 Lobule VI (Hem)
9.21 4 − 62 − 26 Lobule VI (Verm)
6.61 6 − 68 − 38 Lobule VIIIa (Verm)
4.66 22 − 58 − 50 Lobule VIIIb (Hem)
Left M1 cluster 754 8.11 − 34 − 26 60 Area 4a
5.43 − 32 − 24 72 Precentral gyrus
5.07 − 20 − 26 78 Postcentral gyrus
Left thalamic cluster 200 6.45 − 16 − 22 4 Thalamus
Left medial frontal cluster 227 5.61 − 6 − 20 50 CMA

Uncorrected height threshold, p < 0.001; extent threshold, p < 0.05, FWE-corrected in the entire brain. Size = number of active voxels. For anatomical identification of peaks, we only considered cytoarchitectonic areas available in the Anatomy toolbox that had > 30% probabilities. The cytoarchitectonic area with the highest probability was reported for each peak. When no cytoarchitectonic area with a > 30% probability was available to determine a peak, we provided the anatomical location of the peak. In each cluster, we reported peaks that were more than 8 mm apart in the descending T-value order. To facilitate visualization, we avoided reporting a peak for each cluster when it was identified in the cytoarchitectonic area or anatomical structure already reported for a peak with a higher t value

Hem hemisphere, Verm vermis, CMA cingulate motor area