Table 5.
Univariate Cox models to assess the association between AI and the risk of HCC recurrence.
At least one microsatellite | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
exp(coef) [confint] | p | Code | Concordance | |
Panel 1 | 2.95 [0.86, 10.09] | 0.0841 | . | 0.5961 |
Panel 2 | 4.06 [0.94, 17.52] | 0.0602 | . | 0.6092 |
Panel 3 | 2.01 [0.59, 6.86] | 0.2663 | 0.5552 | |
Panel 4 | 2.69 [0.62, 11.59] | 0.1848 | 0.5683 | |
At least one microsatellite (high-level) | ||||
exp(coef) [confint] | p | Code | Concordance | |
Panel 1 | 2.79 [1.11, 7.01] | 0.0286 | * | 0.6282 |
Panel 2 | 4.12 [1.49, 11.35] | 0.0062 | ** | 0.672 |
Panel 3 | 2.79 [1.11, 7.01] | 0.0286 | * | 0.6282 |
Panel 4 | 4.12 [1.49, 11.35] | 0.0062 | ** | 0.672 |
Fractional allelic imbalance | ||||
exp(coef) [confint] | p | Code | Concordance | |
Panel 1 FAI | 11.64 [1.11, 122.15] | 0.0407 | * | 0.6379 |
Panel 2 FAI | 127.58 [4.60, 3535.44] | 0.0042 | ** | 0.6737 |
Panel 3 FAI | 10.04 [0.70, 143.33] | 0.0891 | . | 0.6172 |
Panel 4 FAI | 31.82 [2.08, 487.06] | 0.0129 | * | 0.6627 |
Fractional allelic imbalance (high-level) | ||||
exp(coef) [confint] | p | Code | Concordance | |
Panel 1 FAI | 148.58 [9.39, 2351.75] | 0.0004 | *** | 0.6825 |
Panel 2 FAI | 12736.03 [192.99, 840485.78] | <0.0001 | *** | 0.7255 |
Panel 3 FAI | 1784.22 [40.74, 78135.33] | 0.0001 | *** | 0.6914 |
Panel 4 FAI | 16309.40 [298.76, 890346.50] | <0.0001 | *** | 0.7395 |