Table 2:
Methodological quality of included trials
| Name | SPCG-4 | PIVOT | VACURG |
|---|---|---|---|
| Randomization allocation (SB) | Adequate | Adequate | Unclear risk |
| Allocation concealment (SB) | Adequate | Adequate | Unclear risk |
| Blinding of outcome assessment (SB) | Adequate | Adequate | Unclear risk |
| Incomplete outcome data (AB) | Adequate | Adequate | Inadequate₳ |
| Selective report(RB) | Adequate | Adequate | Unclear risk |
| Other bias₢ | Adequate | Adequate | Inadequate₳ |
| Sample power | 85% power to detect a 25% relative reduction in all-cause mortality | 85% power to detect a 25% relative reduction in all-cause mortality | NM |
| Analysis approach | Intention-to-treatment | Intention-to-treatment | NM |
| Randomization strategies | A telephone service at office outside the clinical units | Central interactive telephone system | NM |
| Stratification in randomization | According to degree of differentiation in cancer grade and center | According to sites | NM |
| Funding source | No industry | No industry | No industry |
If no notable bias exist which effect on results of trial/
if there was a great bias which make misleading on results of trial/
if no sufficient data reported to assess the studies/
NM: not mention in trial’s reports/
SB: selection bias/
AB: attrition bias/
RB: reporting bias/
some biases that did not include in the category