Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 May 5.
Published in final edited form as: J Alzheimers Dis. 2018;64(4):1137–1148. doi: 10.3233/JAD-180016

Table 3:

Dual-task interference on cognition among genetic low and high risk (APOE ε4 carriers) groups

Cognitive Parameters Absolute Difference
Dual-Task Effect (DTEc)
Low Risk Group
N=15
Mean (SD)
High Risk Group
N=14
Mean (SD)
Effect Size for Group Difference Low Risk Group
N=15
Mean (SD)
High Risk Group
N=14
Mean (SD)
Effect Size for Group Difference
Memory (Accuracy) 7.1 (14.1) 3.3 (9.3) 0.31 −11% (27%) −4% (20%) 0.30
EF Task-normal RT (ms) 50 (70) 20 (70) 0.45 −9% (12%) −4% (9%) 0.47
EF task-reverse RT (ms) 40 (110) 30 (100) 0.09 −7% (18%) −4% (13%) 0.16

Absolute difference, difference between parameter in single-task and dual-task condition; DTEc, Dual-Task Effect on cognition: [(dual-task − single-task)/single-task] × 100%. A negative sign precedes the formula when the variable of interest is response time because greater values of response time indicate worse performance; SD, standard deviation; Accuracy, percent of words correctly recalled from the list of 15; RT, response time; EF, executive function task (the go/stop test); values reflect response time.