Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 May 5.
Published in final edited form as: J Alzheimers Dis. 2018;64(4):1137–1148. doi: 10.3233/JAD-180016

Table 4:

Dual-task interference on gait among genetic low risk and high risk (APOE ε4 carriers) groups

Gait Parameters Absolute Difference
Dual-Task Effect (DTEg)
Low Risk Group
N=15
Mean (SD)
High Risk Group
N=14
Mean (SD)
Effect Size for Group Difference Low Risk Group
N=15
Mean (SD)
High Risk Group
N=14
Mean (SD)
Effect Size for Group Difference
Cognitive Task = Memory
Gait Speed (m/s) 0.35 (0.24) 0.40 (0.16) 0.24 −32% (22%) −34% (13%) 0.12
Step Length (cm) 8.9 (7.1) 11.5 (5.2) 0.40 −14% (11%) −18% (7%) 0.36
Cognitive Task = EFnormal
Gait Speed (m/s) 0.13 (0.14) 0.26 (0.20) 0.70 −12% (14%) −21% (14%) 0.62
Step Length (cm) 3.8 (4.7) 8.3 (7.7) 0.69 −6% (8%) −12% (10%) 0.64
Cognitive Task = EFreverse
Gait Speed (m/s) 0.10 (0.17) 0.19 (0.18) 0.48 −10% (16%) −15% (13%) 0.36
Step Length (cm) 3.2 (5.5) 6.3 (6.3) 0.52 −5% (9%) −9% (8%) 0.45

Absolute difference, difference between parameter in single-task and dual-task condition; DTEg, Dual-Task Effect on gait: [(dual-task − single-task)/single-task] × 100%; SD, standard deviation.