Skip to main content
. 2019 Mar-Apr;35(2):489–494. doi: 10.12669/pjms.35.2.604

Table-I.

TAS and sub-dimension outcomes comparisons of some characteristics of students (n: 634).

Characteristics n (%) DRE DEE ETS Total TAS
Gender
 Female 534 (84,2) 18.77 ± 5.38 14.28 ± 2.57 25.58 ± 3.74 55.91 ± 8.09
 Male 99 (15,8) 20.73 ± 6.67 15.62 ± 3.04 26.14 ± 6.74 58.46 ± 11.85
 p 0.006 0.014 0.023 0.003
GPA (four ’system)
 ≤ 2,50 150 (23,6) 20.91 ± 6.16 16.66 ± 2,62 27.45 ± 5,80 58.14 ± 10.53
 ≥ 2,51 484 (76,4) 18.51 ± 5.36 14.22 ± 2,65 25.72 ± 3,79 55.72 ± 8.15
 p 0.001 0.025 0.004 0.004
Level of interpersonal communication
 Gooda 392 (61.8) 18.03 ± 5.60 14.11 ± 2.78 25.88 ± 4.81 55.29 ± 9.55
 Moderateb 228 (35.9) 20.49 ± 5.09 15.66 ± 2.39 25.34 ± 3.41 57.71 ± 7.01
 Weakc 14 (2.3) 25.71 ± 6.15 16.85 ± 2.24 24.85 ± 3.65 62.21 ± 8.90
 p (a-b), (a-c), (b-c) 0.001 0.003 0.004 0.001