Skip to main content
. 2019 Feb 5;109(2):276–287. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/nqy272

TABLE 4.

Associations of lean mass increasing alleles with musculoskeletal phenotypes1

Cross-phenotype
SNP LM IA Gene Effect in M1 M1/M3 ratio, % Type of locus Grip strength FN-BMD LS-BMD Fx
rs9936385 C FTO Yes 234 Sumo Wrestler 0 0 0 – –
rs10871777 G MC4R Yes 222 Sumo Wrestler 0 0 0 0
rs733381 A TNRC6B Yes 125 Intermediate ++ 0 – – +
rs9991501 C HSD17B11 Yes 120 Intermediate 0 0 + 0
rs2287926 A VCAN Yes 64 Body Builder 0 0 0 0
rs4842924 C ADAMTSL3 Yes 67 Body Builder ++ 0 0 0
rs2943656 G IRS1 No NA Indirect/Fat locus 0 0 0 0

1The threshold for a statistically significant association with Bonferroni correction for 4 traits is P = 0.0125 (0.05/4). For further details, see Supplemental Table 8. +, nominal significant increase; ++, multiple testing corrected significant increase; – –, multiple testing corrected significant decrease; 0, no significant effect; BMD, bone mineral density; FN, femoral neck; Fx, fracture; LM IA, lean mass increasing allele; LS, lumbar spine; M1, Model 1 not adjusted for fat; M3, Model 3 adjusted for fat mass in kilograms; M1/M3 ratio, a measure of the degree of attenuation of the lean mass association after fat mass adjustment; NA, not applicable because no effect in M1.