. 2019 Mar 10;13(3):466–492. doi: 10.1177/1932296819831042

Table 8.

Benefits and Consequences Related to DOC Use and Diabetes Type.

Author	Actual or perceived benefits													Actual or perceived consequences								Diabetes type
	Clinical			Psychosocial							Behavioral							Psychosocial
	Supplement to clinical care	A1C	HCP support of DOC use	Shared experience	Social support				Quality of life	Empowerment	Motivation and accountability	Diabetes management	Community building	Help/harm	Information quality	Risky behavior	Acute concerns	Emotional/hostile conflict	Parental outcomes	Privacy	Inactivity	Type 1 diabetes	Type 2 diabetes	Unknown
	Supplement to clinical care	A1C	HCP support of DOC use	Shared experience	Informational	Emotional	Instrumental	Appraisal	Quality of life	Empowerment	Motivation and accountability	Diabetes management	Community building	Help/harm	Information quality	Risky behavior	Acute concerns	Emotional/hostile conflict	Parental outcomes	Privacy	Inactivity	Type 1 diabetes	Type 2 diabetes	Unknown
AlQarni et al³⁹				⊙		⊙						⊙												⊙
Arduser⁴⁰				x		x						x										x	x
Balkhi et al¹⁷		⊙		⊙																		⊙
Balkhi et al¹⁸		⊙		⊙															⊙			⊙
Beguerisse-Diaz et al⁴¹					▪								▪					▪				▪	▪
Bond et al⁴²				x	x							x			x									x
Brady et al²⁸				x								x	x							x		x	x
Brady et al²⁹				x	x	x		x		x	x		x				x					x	x
Browne et al¹⁹	⊙			⊙	⊙	⊙					⊙	⊙										⊙	⊙
Chen⁵⁷	⊙				⊙	⊙						⊙										⊙
Chomutare, 2013⁵⁶												▪							▪		▪	▪	▪
Chomutare 2013⁵⁶		▪						▪													▪		▪
Chomutare, 2012⁵⁷		▪																			▪		▪
Cole et al²⁰															⊙									⊙
Dias, 2012⁵⁸					▪																			▪
Fergie et al³⁰				x							x	x												x
Fergie et al³¹						x		x				x	x		x		x	x						x
Gilbert³²				x	x	x	x	x			x	x	x									x
Greene⁴³				x	x	x	x	x				x	x		x									x
Hastings³³				x	x	x	x	x				x	x			x						x
Hoffman-Goetz⁴⁴	x				x							x			x								x
Huh⁴⁵				x	x	x	x	x			x							x				x
Kelly⁴⁶												x			x									x
Koteyko and Hunt⁴⁷	x			x		x		x			x	x	x									x	x
Lewis⁴⁸				x	x	x						x											x
Libreri⁵⁹				x	x	x	x					x	x											x
Litchman et al³⁴	x			x	x	x	x	x		x		x	x		x		x	x				x
Litchman et al²¹	⊙	⊙	⊙		⊙	⊙	⊙		⊙	⊙		⊙	⊙									x	x
Litchman et al⁴⁹													x											x
Litchman et al⁵⁰		x			x	x	x	x	x			x	x									x
Liu et al⁶⁰																						x	x
Lu et al⁶¹					⊙	⊙						⊙						⊙						⊙
Mogi et al⁵¹				▪	▪	▪						▪										▪	▪
Nelakurthi et al²²	⊙	⊙		⊙				⊙		⊙	⊙	⊙										⊙	⊙
Newman et al³⁵				x	x	x	x	x			x	x	x					x		x				x
O’Kane et al³⁶	x			x	x		x	x				x										x	x
Oh and Lee²³	⊙				⊙	⊙	⊙			⊙														⊙
Oser et al⁵²				x	x	x									x				x			x
Rasmussen et al³⁷				x	x	x		x					x							x		x
Ravert et al⁵³				x	x	x		x				x				x						x
Sparud-Lundin et al³⁸				x	x	X																x
Sparud-Lundin et al²⁴					⊙	⊙		⊙					⊙									⊙
Troncone et al⁵⁸				▪		▪						▪	▪									▪
Vaala et al²⁵		⊙										⊙	⊙									⊙
Van Berkel et al²⁶				⊙	⊙	⊙				⊙		⊙			⊙							⊙	⊙
White et al²⁷	⊙				⊙	⊙	⊙					⊙		⊙										⊙
Zhang et al⁵⁴				x	x	x					x	x	x											x

⊙, quantitative study; x, qualitative study; ▪, social network analysis or text mining study.