Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 Oct 1.
Published in final edited form as: Eur J Neurosci. 2017 Oct 5;48(7):2622–2629. doi: 10.1111/ejn.13695

Figure 3.

Figure 3.

A. Time-frequency representations of the context effect (in relative power changes) averaged over the channels associated with the significant clusters, indicated in white on the topographical maps. The topographical distributions of the significant cluster (8 to 25 Hz, −0.3 to 0 s) are shown for each group. B. Patients’ individual topographical distribution of the context effect (8 to 25 Hz, −0.3 to 0 s), expressed as relative power changes. C. Topographical distribution of the context effect (in relative power changes) averaged over the patients in each cluster from Figure 1D.