Table 2.

Language testing data from the Western Aphasia Battery (WAB) and time elapsed between stroke date (MPO = months post onset) and WAB testing, and between stroke date and the present EEG experiment. Naming = WAB Naming and Word Finding score (maximum = 10). Comprehension = WAB Auditory Verbal Comprehension score (maximum = 10). Sequential commands = WAB comprehension subtest (maximum = 80). Aphasia Quotient (AQ, maximum = 100). WNL = within normal limit.

Patient	Aphasia type	AQ	Naming	Comprehension	Sequential commands	MPO at WAB	MPO at EEG
P1	WNL	99.6	10	10	80	148	174
P2	Anomic	91.6	9.2	10	80	67	209
P3	Anomic	87.2	8.9	8.9	65	68	201
P4	NA*	NA*	NA*	NA*	NA*	NA*	12
P5	Anomic	92.1	9.3	8.83	59.5	34	165
P6	NA*	NA*	NA*	NA*	NA*	NA*	114
P7	Conduction	77.9	8.6	8.55	58	16	23
P8	Anomic	87.8	8.3	8.15	43	47	72
P9	Anomic	92.9	9.5	9.55	72	290	310
P10	WNL	99.6	9.8	10	80	104	121
P11	WNL	94	8.6	10	80	222	230

^*P4 and P6 were not assessed on the WAB. P6 continued teaching in academia after the stroke. Thus, we are confident that this patient would have been classified as within normal limits by the WAB. P4 conversed without difficulty but complained of word-finding problems.