Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2019 Oct 1.
Published in final edited form as: Eur J Neurosci. 2017 Oct 5;48(7):2622–2629. doi: 10.1111/ejn.13695

Table 3.

Error rate (in percentage) and error type per patient and condition. C = constrained; N = neutral.

Patient %C %N Type: constrained Type: neutral
P1 3.9 2.0 hesitation (1), no response (1) did not identify picture (1)
P2 7.8 11.8 no response (1), hesitation with correct response (3) unclassifiable (1), no response (1), hesitation with correct response (4)
P3 3.9 9.8 unclassifiable (1), semantically related response (1) no response (1), did not identify picture (1), unclassifiable (1), semantically related response (2)
P4 2.0 0.0 hesitation with correct response (1) --
P5 5.9 0.0 no response (3) --
P6 0.0 2.0 -- no response
P7 5.9 9.8 no response (3), phonological paraphasia (1) no response (3), semantically related response (1), did not identify picture (1)
P8 2.0 9.8 no response (1) no response (3), hesitation with incorrect response (1), hesitation with correct response (1)
P9 5.9 7.8 hesitation with correct response (3) hesitation with correct response (4)
P10 0.0 2.0 -- semantically related response (1)
P11 7.8 9.8 did not identify picture (1), hesitation with correct response (2), hesitation with incorrect response (1) did not identify picture (2), phonological paraphasia (1), hesitation with correct response (2)